James Delingpole's Climate-gate confrontation

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
224 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 27, 2011

Paul Nurse interviews James Delingpole [Do not own Copyright for this video]

Please check out website http://quackonomics.wordpress.com/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I think the reason they fudged the data is that they were given $55 million in grants and di not want to lose that as well as being the main guys consulting the UN IPCC.I think they should be fired and never be allowed to go near anything scientific or any university or young minds.It is simply the worse fraud on humans everywhere,ever.

  • Delingpole is right to pick Nurse up on this analogy. He is being polite rather than angry. Not non plussed.

    Cancer medicine is based on rigorous experimental practise: trials, double-blind placebo groups etc: they can provide an end test of effectiveness. Climate modelling can do NONE of this, and can provide no comparable "proof" of effectiveness. Nurse knows this.

    He is trying to portray Delingpole as a "doubter of science", whereas sceptics believe in science, and that AGW is BAD science.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more