President Obama's Pledge Never to Raise Taxes on Anyone Making Less Than $250,000 a Year

This footage was taken during than presidential candidate Obama's speech in Dover, NH. President Obama pledges not to raise taxes on anyone making less than $250,000 a year.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• President
• Barack
• Obama
• Taxes
• Pledge
• Grover
• Norquist
• Americans
• for
• Tax
• Reform

[snowwolf7777]

@adrenalinerushskier No, you can't tell people in government in which you share to move to another country, considering, because your preaching capitalist economic, yet anti democracy politics. Capitalism does not equal freedom. The history of socialist movement is connected to american history and American's have embraced socialism in the past, but today it's not really socialism

corporatism is the economic enemy of today, Adam Smith warned uses about how corporatism would exploit his system

[iRHAPEzombiies]

How about we give only taxes to things we need and people who are disabled, and the rest can get off their lazy fat ass's and go earn some fucking money

[MrPalmer1010]

That's a croc

[snowwolf7777]

@RythmandStrings not true, His plain would have eliminated the US debt by now, if only bush didn't touch it. Can someone who reply to my comment actual study some economics or know how the public debt works. This idiot is example is so stupid it makes me want to cry.

[RythmandStrings]

@snowwolf7777 Clinton made a "budget" surplus. He did nothing for the national debt. All he did was spend less for a few years. If my yearly budget was 50,000, but I spent 30,000. It wouldn't mean jack shit if I still owed 400,000 on my 500,000 home, two cars and whatever else! Clinton didn't do shit

[gregjalbert]

Tax corporations so they do not get away with no taxation. The Citizens for Tax Justice put out a report recently with that 12 major corporations like Honeywell, Verizon, General Electric, and in three years, they made $167 billion in profit, paid zero in taxes, and got $2.5 billion back from the treasury. Solution to Debt Crisis is to End Corporate Welfare and Corporate Tax Loopholes -- youtube . com/watch?v=wbMifGKH -- DemocracyNow . org

[snowwolf7777]

@kfeder76 No, I agree that was also false growth. However, unlike bush, Clinton knew that growth wasn't going to last too. He made the investments in all the right places and provide a surplus for the US to counter and eliminate debt, so next time we would be in an economic crises we would have money to saved up to get us out of it. It would have been Keynesian economics model recovery, however the government doesn't have money because of Bush.

[kfeder76]

@snowwolf7777 So if the market is unable to sustain itself it is false and therefore worthless huh....ok than the run up we had in the 90's was also unsustainable therefore false as well...was that because Clinton doesn't know shit about economics too????? I tend to believe the markets in the long term get it right based on EPS. In the short run the estimates for EPS are often over or under exagerated. Under Bush....stocks in general saw good earnings growth but had too high of expectations.

[kfeder76]

@snowwolf7777 yah I have been investing in the market since 1996...congratulations on your degree....I went to college too...I majored in Business as well.....I have a finance degree....I also attained a Series 7 license and 63 license....pretty sure I am more knowledgeable on the securities markets than you.....or does your masters in business give you the ability to sell securities?????????

[snowwolf7777]

@kfeder76 it's worthless because the market couldn't sustain it self, that's why it collapsed under Bush watch. The idiot didn't know a thing a about economics. You might as well be playing with monopoly money because it's only valuable in short term, and you been watching the market since 1996? I actual went to college and have a masters in business.

[kfeder76]

@snowwolf7777 so based on your theory if we slip back into or double dip in this recession the gains you are talking about now would be worthless too? Also....corporations were worth more because we were in a housing bubble? HMM....you know I have followed Wall St. since 1996...I have seen rally's and I have seen declines...I love how the rally's under Bush don't count but the one's under Clinton and Obama do? Who is not worth talking to? You you fucking retard...a rally is a rally .

[snowwolf7777]

@kfeder76 You mean before the recession, that's because we were in the housing bubble. That gain was worthless. I'm sorry, but if you want lie and bullshit your facts, work for Fox. Your not worth talking too, if all I'm doing is debunking you pathetic banter you call an argument.