Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

President Obama's Pledge Never to Raise Taxes on Anyone Making Less Than $250,000 a Year

This footage was taken during than presidential candidate Obama's speech in Dover, NH. President Obama pledges not to raise taxes on anyone making less than $250,000 a year.  
 
Customize
Series (4)
More From Channel

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
41 ratings
Sign in to rate
22,375 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (93)   Options

Loading...
simroos (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
More:
I don't think you're understanding the humor in that Keynes quote...
Whatever you think about developmentalism (which began much earlier than '41 btw) the fact is that the strongest, most widely distributed period of growth in the history of this country occurred after and as a direct result of increased government intervention. And it wasn't just "leaders". Most of these policies were won through the struggles of working people. Economists always come after the fact.
simroos (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The statement "100% Keynsian" could only strike you as odd if you thought I was referring to every single idea or policy position the man ever advocated, a supposition that would itself be ridiculous and show that you don't really care about understanding the point. "100% Keynesian" obviously refers to the basic premise that an efficient, productive and stable economy requires an interventionist state, which was indeed the post WWII orthodoxy.
"We're all Keynesians now" -Richard Nixon
hsfbunny (3 days ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
What a shame Keynes was not born in in 1750.

Just think what his genius would have given America, if only it were to grace us then. American suffered as a economic backwater until 1941, Keynes, and our wise government leaders stepped in..




"100% Keynesian" This is ridiculous. The Fed cherry picked few politically expedient ideas from Keynes.

The avoidance of taxes is the only intellectual pursuit that still carries any reward. - John Keynes
simroos (4 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Why? Have you actually looked at the bill? There is nothing in there about income tax increases for those under 250k. Wherever you're getting your information from is not serving you well my friend.
DinosaurJesus (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Taxes on medical devices and equipment (wheelchairs, pacemakers, etc.). FORCING people to buy insurance, which will keep people from putting food on the table in order to comply with the government mandate. Doing nothing about the cost of health insurance - all they're doing is putting out a government plan that costs more than most nongovernment plan.

This is NOT about reform. This is about more money and power for government. Obama and Reid know NOTHING about the medical/insurance industry.
simroos (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The AHC Act, at least the house version, balances new tax breaks against possible fines pretty well. It is a shit bill though. H.R. 3962 would have been a lot cheaper and much more fair to the average American. Blame the Republicans and the insurance companies on killing that one though.
A minuscule corporate tax on giant medical supply companies doesn't make me feel bad in the least.
As for your thing about the government trying to get rich, sounds to me like BS right wing propaganda.
hsfbunny (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yes I have read the bill.

The funding the for the Health "Choices" Act is implemented through the Federal Tax Code, and collected by the IRS. This is clearly indicated in the first five pages.

Failure to pay, is prosecuted through the Tax Evasion statutes in the IRS code book.

If your claim of reading is bill is true, and your source of knowledge was your own mind....

Well, what does that say about your source?
simroos (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I don't see the comment I posted last night where I exposed your lying about having read the AHCA (the "first five pages" thing which shows that not only have you not read this bill and are in fact totally ignorant about its contents, but that you have probably never read a piece of actual legislation in your life). Pointing out to the hipocricy, dishonesty and ignorance of right-wingers is basically why I am here, so its kind of important. :)
hsfbunny (48 minutes ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I will prove you wrong. Copied directly from the bill, version "AAHCA09"

"(A) TAXES ON INDIVIDUALS NOT OBTAINING ACCEPTABLE COVERAGE.—The amounts received in the Treasury under section 59B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986"

"(B) EMPLOYMENT TAXES ON EMPLOYERS NOT PROVIDING ACCEPTABLE COVERAGE.—The amounts received in the Treasury under section 3111(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986"

The word "TAX" appears 172 times
The word "FEE" appears 77 times
The word "IRS" appears 100 times
simroos (4 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
You obviously didn't pay any attention to the Obama campaign and don't know much about the legislation that is currently being debated. The plan he proposed back in '07 was objectively more progressive than either the House or Senate versions now being discussed and none of the three have any kind of income tax increase below the 250k bracket. Your numbers are also way off on cap and trade; the CBO says that in the worst case it'll be more like $100 and will decrease rapidly in subsequent years.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.