@julianbautista87 Architects for 9/11 truth; there are some certified architects showing unequivocal proof that the buildings could not have collapsed naturally. Give it a watch, if only to see another side of the argument.
@AustinHU4Fl If a building collapses in on itself, it does so toward the weakest point - this is simple physics - the object will travel in the direction of least friction. Not, like shown, straight down perfectly into its own footprint. Which, by the way, has never happened in the history of any steel or otherwise tower collapsing - and it happened 3 times in one day here.
@kiddownstreet4 Not you, or your government. Members within that government. There is no way something this big would be shared amongst all members of government, not everyone is a heartless bastard.
@47927411D I direct your clearly well informed mind to architects for 9/11 truth. I would post a link but youtube doesn't let you. Do some research there and see if you come to the same well informed decision you have here.
i find this funny because i watched a video of 911 going down and at the same time i watched the mahna mahna song from the muppets sides 911 is gay shit
@PJWolf35 What about WT7? That looked like a controlled collapse starting from the bottom, yes? It did not get hit by a plane, and no other buildings have ever gone down like that due to fire, to my knowledge. Based on this, why is it so difficult to believe that the towers weren't taken down by a modified controlled demolition with multiple timed collapse blast points?
@jpride100 No, he said this isn't even a fraction of the proof out there - not that he has found himself - this is what he has found. Read properly.
johnnylr 1 day ago
@julianbautista87 Architects for 9/11 truth; there are some certified architects showing unequivocal proof that the buildings could not have collapsed naturally. Give it a watch, if only to see another side of the argument.
johnnylr 1 day ago
@christopher74664 Christ. Research; do some.
johnnylr 1 day ago
@AustinHU4Fl (collapsing by means other than demolition)
johnnylr 1 day ago
@AustinHU4Fl If a building collapses in on itself, it does so toward the weakest point - this is simple physics - the object will travel in the direction of least friction. Not, like shown, straight down perfectly into its own footprint. Which, by the way, has never happened in the history of any steel or otherwise tower collapsing - and it happened 3 times in one day here.
johnnylr 1 day ago
@kiddownstreet4 Not you, or your government. Members within that government. There is no way something this big would be shared amongst all members of government, not everyone is a heartless bastard.
johnnylr 1 day ago
@47927411D I direct your clearly well informed mind to architects for 9/11 truth. I would post a link but youtube doesn't let you. Do some research there and see if you come to the same well informed decision you have here.
johnnylr 1 day ago
cool seeing the first vid of the controlled demolitions in oslo, i was there!
MrDryass88 2 days ago
i find this funny because i watched a video of 911 going down and at the same time i watched the mahna mahna song from the muppets sides 911 is gay shit
superdonutman1234 2 days ago
@PJWolf35 What about WT7? That looked like a controlled collapse starting from the bottom, yes? It did not get hit by a plane, and no other buildings have ever gone down like that due to fire, to my knowledge. Based on this, why is it so difficult to believe that the towers weren't taken down by a modified controlled demolition with multiple timed collapse blast points?
cketterl78 5 days ago