Creationism VS Evolution Debate @ Christ Church in Yukon, OK Part 14

Abbie Smith VS Dr. Charles Jackson on the topic: Does Molecular Genetics Support Human Evolution? @ Christ Church in Yukon, OK

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• creationism
• evolution
• abbie smith
• charles jackson
• yukon oklahoma
• molecular genetics

[RJL738]

Even though humans are generally bad at compartmentalising humans often compartmentalise at the wrong time and uncompartmentalise at the wrong times, they must have a second layer of compartmental deficiency and are bad at comaprtmentalising between these layers and so on so maybe humans have a recursive compartmentilisation problem in concepts, this is annoying. To be fair not just two of every survive but for some a far larger amount.

[RJL738]

He is right about the irony between Earth and Mars however Mars does have an atmosphere but it is only barely thick enough to be called an actual atmospehre, any thinner and it would just be an envelope of trace gases. Out of more planets known than all human words ever said and maybe a few hundred times the number of stars in the universe, imagine what must have happened on those planets that would be similar in catastrophic nature to this.

[RJL738]

That is true that even though contemporary geology does go with the evolutionary theory of life that the actual theory of evolution only applies to biology and explains how present lifeforms got here, it does not explain how life got here in the first place or became much beyond single celled. Evolution is biology that is something that I realise and many others should.

[Daibhidh464]

Regarding Gene Pools. According to the Bible, all the clean animals had seven male and seven females for each kind, but the unclean animals only got one pair of every kind onto the Ark.

[NekoMouser]

@billynunns

So your argument is that the Biblical evidence for the breaking up of a Pangea-like super continent to explain how animals ended up on diverse islands AFTER the flood is that it all occurred DURING the flooding itself? Waters came up, shifted plates, then went down, and...now you are in the same boat or trying to explain how the platypuses in the Middle East got back to New Zealand. Also, you are still ignoring ALL the SCIENTIFIC evidence contradicting such an idea. So...try again?

[billynunns]

“The first misunderstanding is that science ‘proves’ anything. Nothing in science is ever ‘proven’, it is only confirmed by observation; but such confirmation is always tentative. No matter how well or how long a scientific theory has been confirmed, it is always subject to falsification or correction by new observations.”

[billynunns]

@NekoMouser When you read Genesis it says that waters came from the deep and from the heavens. that would cause massive erosion and up lifting up plates that would cause massive tectonic shifts.

[bdrasin]

*Yawn* c'mon, lets have some more Abbie Smith. She's much more interesting than this guy.

[lmhjs1000]

Its about time this creationist idiot had some decent questions thrown at him