HOW FAIR IS THIS?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
21 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 28, 2011

The top jury verdict in Virginia in the last 25 years was $212 million. It was awarded b federal jury in Richmond to a Vietnam veteran who suffered brain damage after a Botox injection. The award was $12 million for compensatory damages and $200 million for punitive damages. Compensatory damages are to help what can be helped, fix what can be fixed and to make up for what can not be fixed or helped. Compensatory damages include past, present, and future medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Punitive damages are to publish the wrongdoer for what he has done and to make an example of him so that others are reluctant to do the same thing. The jury listened to all the evidence, deliberated, and decided that what was fair for him what was done to him. HOW FAIR IS THIS? In spite of the jury's decision, the judge reduce the verdict to $12.35 million. Yes, the judge can do that. In this case, the judge was required by law to reduce the verdict because the Virginia legislature put a cap of $350,000 on punitive damages.

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (0)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more