1997 Geo Metro - Look Around (2/2)

Just giving a tour of the 1997 Geo Metro and its 3cyl 1.0L 40mpg 55 HP @ 5,700 rpm; 58 ft lb @ 3,300 rpm engine.
Video 2

http://86c2ec92.linkgalleries.net

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• 1997
• geo
• metro
• cyl
• 1.0l
• mpg
• HP
• engine
• tour
• exhaust
• stock
• yt:crop=16:9

[darklighter456]

does it have a tilt stearing wheel jw

[jmoyet]

@darklighter456 No tilt steering wheel.. this car is as basic as it gets.. lol

Power nothing except brakes and no A/C.

[mrcoo5]

TURBO IT

[jmoyet]

Someday I will but not yet. Been thinking of a supercharger for a future mod since the crank pulley has an extra slot for a second belt.

[nandoGdog]

Give the guy a break he loves his car, that's what this website is all about. I wish I had a GEO Metro with the price of gas nowdays.

[JohnFromSpace]

Its sad that there are people hating on you.

Why are they looking at Metro Videos anyway.

My Metro has a permanent spot in my stable because the car has charm.

[20CorvetteZr109]

is inscurance cheap on this car?

[AndrewJ26]

Very fuel efficient, especially when it comes time to drive it to the junk yard

[DasMidnightDrifter]

@jmoyet Turbos tend to be more efficient, and you don't lose any economy when staying out of the boost. :3

[conservativeMADman]

@halflife103 i like the ranger better if for no other reason it feels safer and ride quality and sound proofing is better, but if your looking for a speed sensation look no further than a metro, 60 mph in the metro feels like 80mph in a normal sized car, (mines a 94 metro which is the older body style) it corners pretty darn good despite the fact it has no sway bars lol. and that 52hp is actually fun to drive.

[halflife103]

@conservativeMADman oh which ride do you like better?

[conservativeMADman]

i have both a ranger and a metro lol, metro gets higher mpg of course. those things get 50 high way easy, if you drive em right like you said.