Evidence on fake photos in mission Apollo 11, Part 1

This video is a part of my series of videos proving that the photos which are in the Apollo journal are fake and have not been taken on the moon.
These videos also show that the fakers really intended to give clues the photos are fake, which means that they were wanting these photos to be proven fake sooner or later.
It seems obvious that those who were in charge for faking the photos disagreed with those who gave the orders of faking the photos, and thought it's not right making people believe that photos which were made on earth in a studio were made on the moon.
These videos just prove the photos are fake, they don't prove men didn't land on the moon.
This video is the first part on the fake photos of mission Apollo 11.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Moon
• hoax
• faked
• moon
• pictures
• BadAstronmy
• debunk
• myths
• NASA
• Surveyor

[Tweekerhead]

@crubkings First off, I can't really follow your incoherent ramblings.

Anyway what does what you think about me in any way have to do with the subject at hand?

[crubkings]

@Tweekerhead i think you are either too scared to fake reality or that you are a little softie who wore a blazer, a pair of sandals, shorts and a cap to school and were the teachers pet, its obvious they faked it

[Tweekerhead]

The windows of the CM and LM were coated with magnesium fluoride, hence the blue hue you see in so many photos', like the ones were hoaxers think they're in LEO.

How about doing a video comparing the LRO images and the lunar ascent and descent 16mm films that were taken. Are you afraid of what you'll find Hunchy?

Nice music as always Hunch.

[Daddyo930]

@garciah2 I wonder how much you know about physics period with that statement. By avoiding the subject matter, you try and make yourself appear more knowledgeable yet you know nothing. Give it a rest. Why you trying to get butt off my man's name? Your a bird and a hater.

[Daddyo930]

YDDES is obviously a moron. Wouldn't be surprised if he were a mormon too.

[garciah2]

I wonder what this guy didn't do while he was """"""researching""""""  all his """"""""""""facts"""""""""""". Imagine if he apply all this brain power to his World of Warcraft characters. He could rule the whole World!! (of warcraft)

[YDDES]

@hunchbacked OK, just check with a person with experience in photography. He/she will tell You that the photo in question looks quite normal. To be sure, check with more than one person.

[hunchbacked]

@YDDES

No, wrong, they never used a wide angle lens.

The angle of vision of the Hasselblad is even measurable by using the panoramics that the astronauts did, especially in Apollo 17; I calculated it to 45° (exactly 45.6, but the decimal part comes from the little errors of measurement).

[YDDES]

@hunchbacked They didn't use a wide angle lens just for this photo. They used it for most photos. But, as I said, not an extreme wide angle. But enough "wide angled" to make the rock at some distance to look smaller.

[hunchbacked]

@YDDES

On the other hand, on some photos on which the earth appears small, it is absolutely obvious that they are not taken with a wide angle lens, for the foreground looks too close for the photo to have been taken with a wide angle (in particular with the photo taken close to the LM, and the photo in Apollo 17 of Cernan taking Schmitt).