Debating Calvinism (James White vs. Dave Hunt on John 6:37-44)

While you're watching this video, notice first and foremost which position appeals to subjective philosophy and opinion and which appeals to objective Scripture. If you take nothing else from this video, make sure you take that into account and answer the question of who does what accurately.

James White has said himself that the Calvinistic interpretation of John 6:37-44 is irrefutable. I agree.


Thanks to ejaystube for providing this clip. I've been looking for it for a while now since I saw it about a year ago.


http://www.crosstv.com

Category:

Education

Tags:

• james
• white
• dave
• hunt
• calvinism
• arminianism
• jesus
• christ

[bammc19]

Whats with the creepy music playing during the scripture reading..? btw... THUMBS UP FOR TULIP BABY!

[lllannallll]

@ReformedEklektos "To say he draws every single person is inconsistent to what the rest of the Bible teaches and leads to universalism."  No it doesn't.

[lllannallll]

@lessingtom And good luck with neonleon: when I gave him Thayer's Lexicon as a source, he told me twice that he "didn't know where I got my definitions," and ended the conversation. He is but a smatterer and has no more use for Thayer, Liddell and Scott, etc than for the Farmer's Almanac. Oh, then he simply said,"You seem angry (because I disagreed with him), and I'm done talking to you."

[lessingtom]

@neonleonification

Chapter and verse please where Jesus said that believers would be baptized with fire. What testimonies in Acts prove that the disciples were baptized with fire? Living victoriously does not come through an alleged baptism with fire but by taking up your cross and dying to your own desires and ego. Regarding signs and wonders, read the following: Mat 16:4;

[lessingtom]

@neonleonification

Gal 4:16 in context says: "And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father. Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ." It's just another way of saying: You were baptized with the HG. There is no mention of fire here. What is greater than being an heir of God through Christ? Is baptism with fire going to give you more than that?

[lessingtom]

@neonleonification

What's the difference between baptism with the Holy Ghost and with fire? Is the latter more powerful than the other? Isn't the Holy Ghost sufficient? It's like saying: Jesus is all sufficient and all efficient but you need something more - like Jesus + something else. Would you care to tell us how you were baptized with fire?

[neonleonification]

@lessingtom Galatians 4:16. I have no quarrel with you friend. I will only stand on the word of God. You called the baptism with fire heretical. Yet that contradicts what Jon the baptist and Jesus spoke, it also discounts portion's of the apostles testimony in Acts. What i spoke was true, you aren't living victoriously. But you can. If you don't believe in signs following the word and the baptism of the holy spirit it doesn't make you any less Christian, but you are missing out

[lessingtom]

@neonleonification

I can see that you just adore judging other people without the slightest knowledge of what they believe.