Brief Summary of "A Curious Proof That God Does Not Exist"

West, John and Sonja West. The Devil's Delusion: A Discussion Guide. Seattle: Discovery Institute Press, 2009.

www.discovery.org/csc

www.faithandevolution.org

Category:

Education

Tags:

• The
• Devil's
• Delusion
• Discussion
• Guide
• jcrebel18
• DasAmericanAtheist
• David
• Berlinski
• Atheism
• Science

[miglegtr]

in the beginning it sounds like you say "hey youtube is god again" hahahah

now THATs proof that he exists hehe

[jcrebel18]

lol. I actually said it's scott, but thx for the humor. :)

[miglegtr]

hehe

[jcrebel18]

Evidence isn't required as this is already a known fact.

If there are no specified instructions then how are you going to build a new body plan. Let me save you some time, YOU CAN'T.

Quit with the assertions that "I'm lying," and bring me something better.

[jcrebel18]

You would be correct if you're talking about Dawkins' use of the word "improbable."

What do lies have to do with it?

Funny, considering I got that information from a "bloody biologist." Biologists have known it for decades, so you could probably find evidence yourself.

[jcrebel18]

Wrong from the start? How much you willing to bet on that?

It would, but of course there is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact.

Bland assertions as usual.

[jcrebel18]

As I said, I will go into this more in my overview of the book.

Depends on how the blood splatter got there. But that's beside the point.

In order for the origin of life and evolution to take place, you have to have CSI.

[jcrebel18]

Oh, my mistake. Sorry James. :(

But anyways, if you want to discuss this stuff when I get to it, you might want to subscribe. ;)

[DasAmericanAtheist]

My argument actually had less to do with the cosmological argument (though that was the bulk of what was discussed, I confess), and more to do with the need to satisfy PSR that befalls the theist in light of the the flaws in Leibniz's argument.