911 Passengers Could be Fictitious - Part 2
Uploader Comments (11September2009)
All Comments (82)
-
how do "they" know there were 5 hijackers ?
why not 3 or 4 (it should be enough to do the job, once inside pilots area to take control and flight the plane
-
You would think that there would've been numerous stories of family and associates of the passenger 'victims'. Unless I'm missing a lot I've only heard of 1 to date. That could be easily fabricated. And of the hundreds of people there must have been some personal effects, body parts etc. Confirmation of any of these would put to rest these theories.
-
@whatthef0911 The complete list of passengers, and crew totals 265. Basic research into the names proves this could never be faked. The families and communities involved alone make this vicsims theory a complete joke. There was a memorial event for flight attendant Karen Martin in Danvers MA, the next town from where I lived at the time, that was flooded with people. There are obviously some things that need explaining around 911, but this is not one of them. It's ludicrous.
-
Great factual reporting but you should emphasize the whole point of this excersize:
1) The Airlines which should own the flight manifests NEVER RELEASED THE MANIFESTS.
2) The media actively and purposefully OBSCURED THAT FACT by publishing lists that only sounded or seemed official.
The question which Elias Davidson is asking is why the Airlines are refusing to release the manifests or ANY PROOF THE FLIGHTS TOOK PLACE.
-
@patthespark the diamonds were vaporized upon impact ;-/
-
@beastshawnee I think that story was BS wasn't it?
-
i think its a very feesable idea, we see interviews and read of family members who lost someone to the towers that day but ive never cone across any media coverage of the families who lost people on the planes. has anybody else.
-
@11September2009 it seems to me that the conspirators took decommissioned planes and then brought in their own military planes attached with flight controllers.
I'm asking because I really want to understand. Couldn't this just be really crappy journalism? No one bothering to check facts, using several different sources...etc? How often do media outlets all have the same exact facts? I believe 9/11 was a catastrophic inside job, so I don't need to be convinced, I just would like to understand this aspect of the tragedy.
TwitterBug26 1 year ago
@TwitterBug26
The lists were fabricated out of thin air.
There were no victims.
11September2009 1 year ago 4
@11September2009 What about the pictures of the victims? Where did they get those?
TwitterBug26 1 year ago
@TwitterBug26
Reality based inputs twisted and reproduced with face morphing and image altering technology.
11September2009 1 year ago 5
Two weeks ago the french tv quickly shows (in a "pseudo debate" on 9/11 intitules "L'objet du scandale") a allegedly picture of the co-pilot on flight 77. It semt to be a skinless people. Do you think it's a real victim ?
PincezMoiJeReve 2 years ago
Flight 77 was "deregistered" and classified as destroyed only on 1/02.
FAA regulations state that this must be done on the date they are destroyed.
Officially it never took off. The data was left blank concerning the flight. Although the data was logged on 9/10 it was absent on 911 - Every other plane that day had been recorded.
Flight 77 did not crash at the pentagon and the passenger lists are fabricated.
How can someone be a victim of an accident that did not take place?
11September2009 2 years ago 18