Rick Santorum Argues With Student Over Gay Marriage

No description available.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• rick Santorum
• gay marriage
• Penn State
• student
• Rick Santorum student argument
• gay families

[YAHSHUAisLORD1]

Santorum 2012

[William360engle]

SUCK MY FUCKING DICK SANTORUM

[splicedenergy]

@coleaddison For some stupid reason you've yet to find out that marriage predates monotheistic religion. Marriage IS NOT a religious idea. It is not owned by religion. It's always been a social contract in this country. Not to mention people who live with each other who have not been LEGALLY MARRIED become legally married with an exchange of vows or even being aware of themselves being married after 7 years! Marriage is a legal construct. Not a religious construct.

[coleaddison]

@roxas12590 Publication written by two Wharton School of Business PHDs). In addition, more than 80% of our prison population is products of single mother homes. If you think marriage and/or responsible parenting doesn’t matter; you’re either blind or a liar… Oh, and don’t think it excepted me that you are now holding the position that marriage, an intuition that is so wonderful…more people should be allowed to do it…is suddenly a failed institution. You're so fucking lost.

[coleaddison]

@roxas12590 BUSINESS! And no…every study known to man emphatically proves that children raised in a home with two, opposite sexed parents (at least one of which is employed), who have never been divorced/remarried and who regularly attend religious services (you’ll bitch about that one; but it’s a fact) have an over 200% likelihood of graduating from a 4 year college as compared to that of children raised in ‘alternative’ family units (I can send you the Wall Street Journal

[coleaddison]

@roxas12590 responsibility). The problem with your views is that you want more choice, and virtually zero responsibility! I don’t give a shit what hole you want to stick your pecker in…I’m not anti-gay love or anti-gay relationships…but when you push those relationships down societies throats by demanding we should legally recognize them and change the legal definitions of one of our most important civil intuitions-- sorry, but it does become MY BUSINESS…you forced it to be MY

[coleaddison]

@roxas12590 Mrs. Asshole's inability to honor a contract they freely signed…and call it ‘a right to choice;’ I’m simply agreeing with your first point that divorce does have detrimental effects on children. Don't sign the fucking contract and have kids unless you're damn sure it’s the right thing to do! Yes, America is about choice...but it’s also about being responsible for the consequences of those choices (individual freedom is paid in the currency of individual

[coleaddison]

@roxas12590 Again, you are simply and factually dead wrong. Divorce was legal before the No Fault Laws on the grounds of abuse or criminal activity. The change was that you LIBERAL DEMOCRATS made virtually 'anything' grounds for disolovement. Thus, a fuck-stick like you can sign a lifelong contract and then break it within 2 months of having your first (now fucked up) kid…for no other reason expect “'I just felt so smothered.” While you so righteously defend Mr. and

[roxas12590]

@coleaddison children suffering comes from incompetent parents married or not! grow up

[roxas12590]

@coleaddison yes because once again giving people freedom, a choice is such a bad thing. all those laws did was expose how flawed the relationship is in the first place. based on your logic keeping them together and causing stress and no doubt an increase in domestic violence is a good. it's all about choice, and peoples choices are for the millionth time NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS. those laws exist because people wanted that choice and they have the right to have it.