@1coupe1 You don't hear white people saying racial violence is offensive? Then you are not listening hard enough. White liberals say it practically every time they talk. Have you ever heard of the Civil Rights movement or the election of Abraham Lincoln? Pointing to other bad behavior does not serve as a counterargument any way. The fact that Wright is not running for president is irrelevant. Somebody who went to his church for twenty years IS the president.
where's my 40 acres and mule, if they want to talk about offensive.Video of my ancestors being kicked, beaten,hung, sprayed with fire hoses and god only knows what else. ...I DONT HERE WHITE AMERICA SAYING THAT WAS OFFENSIVE.HEY WORD ON THE STREET IS- REV.WRIGHT IS NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!! GOD SHALL HAVE THE LAST WORD!!!!!!
Fucking pandering whore. Anyone who appears on O'Reilly and doesn't constantly disagree with him and tell him to fuck off isn't someone I want to see in the white house. Bill is nothing more than an ignorant fear-monger. fucking Clinton.
You cannot deny MSNBC, Olbermann, Matthews, Huff Post and DailyKos are disgustingly biased towards Obama. They are the ones dividing this party. Truth be told, majority of Clinton supporters don't personally attack Obama supporters like Obama supporters do to Hillary. It has turned me off to possibly voting for Obama when these same supporters of Obama now ask for Hillary supporters to unite and forget what they said about them. Your comments insulting Hillary supporters is a great example
Disliked in the Senate? Nope. That's not accurate. And negative attacks as rebuttals are still negative attacks. If you are going to run on that premise of no negative attacks stick with it. And with the Rev. Wright issue. The media has ALWAYS praised Obama for his handling of the issue. They thought his race speech was brilliant! and loved that he didn't denounce him then a few weeks later they loved that he finally denounced him! Oh please.
Evidently. You have people with Obama who refuse to vote for a deceptive snake, and people on Hilary's side who fear change.
I wanna ask again why you'd allow McCain to quench the presidency by refusing to vote for Obama, but I suppose we should wait a couple more weeks to see how things turn out, then return to the subject. Make sure there are no more [Obama Focused] surprises.
If you're not lazy, then you go to his website to find out the specifics (those who lack internet access are obviously an exception). Clinton explains what she'll do because she knows that most people she's talking to don't have IP access.
Also, I doubt anyone believes that he doesn't lie. He may have lied about never hearing the offensive statements given by Reverend Wright. I'm not sure if he was lying or if God truly blessed him to not hear Wright during those sermons. Who knows?
No President can do all of what they promised. You said it yourself just then, it's all up to the congress. If teh president can make a compelling enough aurgument to the Senate and House of Reps, then it's possible to achieve roughly a third of their promises. Hilary is greatly despised right now in the Senate, and John McCain will have a tough time getting much of anything through the Democratic run Congress. Obama is well respected amongst the party right now. He'd get the job done.
You act as if the media have never touched Obama. WHo do you think have been circulating the Wright controversies up until last week? Who do you think discussed "Bitter" politics for two weeks straight. To assume that Obama has had a free ride is ludicrous. I'm not even gonna bother with the first statement. You know just as well as I that the Obama campaign only attacks in rebuttal when Hillary chucks the first mortar.
@1coupe1 You don't hear white people saying racial violence is offensive? Then you are not listening hard enough. White liberals say it practically every time they talk. Have you ever heard of the Civil Rights movement or the election of Abraham Lincoln? Pointing to other bad behavior does not serve as a counterargument any way. The fact that Wright is not running for president is irrelevant. Somebody who went to his church for twenty years IS the president.
thimoneus 1 year ago
where's my 40 acres and mule, if they want to talk about offensive.Video of my ancestors being kicked, beaten,hung, sprayed with fire hoses and god only knows what else. ...I DONT HERE WHITE AMERICA SAYING THAT WAS OFFENSIVE.HEY WORD ON THE STREET IS- REV.WRIGHT IS NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!! GOD SHALL HAVE THE LAST WORD!!!!!!
1coupe1 3 years ago
Fucking pandering whore. Anyone who appears on O'Reilly and doesn't constantly disagree with him and tell him to fuck off isn't someone I want to see in the white house. Bill is nothing more than an ignorant fear-monger. fucking Clinton.
YourGodIsntReal 3 years ago
Wrong Hillary's negitives are 50+ while Obama is in the 30s
genYprogressive 3 years ago
You cannot deny MSNBC, Olbermann, Matthews, Huff Post and DailyKos are disgustingly biased towards Obama. They are the ones dividing this party. Truth be told, majority of Clinton supporters don't personally attack Obama supporters like Obama supporters do to Hillary. It has turned me off to possibly voting for Obama when these same supporters of Obama now ask for Hillary supporters to unite and forget what they said about them. Your comments insulting Hillary supporters is a great example
akktive1 3 years ago
Disliked in the Senate? Nope. That's not accurate. And negative attacks as rebuttals are still negative attacks. If you are going to run on that premise of no negative attacks stick with it. And with the Rev. Wright issue. The media has ALWAYS praised Obama for his handling of the issue. They thought his race speech was brilliant! and loved that he didn't denounce him then a few weeks later they loved that he finally denounced him! Oh please.
akktive1 3 years ago
Evidently. You have people with Obama who refuse to vote for a deceptive snake, and people on Hilary's side who fear change.
I wanna ask again why you'd allow McCain to quench the presidency by refusing to vote for Obama, but I suppose we should wait a couple more weeks to see how things turn out, then return to the subject. Make sure there are no more [Obama Focused] surprises.
mike50333 3 years ago
If you're not lazy, then you go to his website to find out the specifics (those who lack internet access are obviously an exception). Clinton explains what she'll do because she knows that most people she's talking to don't have IP access.
Also, I doubt anyone believes that he doesn't lie. He may have lied about never hearing the offensive statements given by Reverend Wright. I'm not sure if he was lying or if God truly blessed him to not hear Wright during those sermons. Who knows?
mike50333 3 years ago
No President can do all of what they promised. You said it yourself just then, it's all up to the congress. If teh president can make a compelling enough aurgument to the Senate and House of Reps, then it's possible to achieve roughly a third of their promises. Hilary is greatly despised right now in the Senate, and John McCain will have a tough time getting much of anything through the Democratic run Congress. Obama is well respected amongst the party right now. He'd get the job done.
mike50333 3 years ago
You act as if the media have never touched Obama. WHo do you think have been circulating the Wright controversies up until last week? Who do you think discussed "Bitter" politics for two weeks straight. To assume that Obama has had a free ride is ludicrous. I'm not even gonna bother with the first statement. You know just as well as I that the Obama campaign only attacks in rebuttal when Hillary chucks the first mortar.
mike50333 3 years ago