32000 Scientists

To help support Climate Denial Crock of the Week
Go to
http://climatecrocks.com/

32,000 leading scientists signed a petition against global warming?
Is that really true?
Well, no....
But to get to the bottom of this crock , we'll have to go back in history, and meet someone who really was, at one time, a leading scientist.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Climate change
• climate
• global warming
• CO2
• carbon dioxide
• Al Gore
• banned video
• Peter Sinclair
• greenman3610
• Oregon Petition
• Crock
• Denial
• Denier
• Climate Denier
• Climate Denial
• earth
• atmosphere
• smoking
• tobacco
• 32000
• 32000 scientists
• petition
• climate petition
• IPCC

[Delphinus72]

And now 5,000 MORE e-mails released showing the chicanery on the part of the climate scientologists. Climategate 2.0

[greenman3610]

@Delphinus72

will this be any better than the first one? cuz that fell pretty flat.

see here

watch?v=tz8Ve6KE-Us

watch?v=P70SlEqX7oY

watch?v=eJFZ88EH6i4

watch?v=5WvasALL-hw

[DaToNyOyO]

We will all die at the hands of the greedy and religiously deluded. The only up side is that those fuckers will die too.

[WaxItYourself]

@whodathunkit1960 In science all data is adjusted. IF it is not adjusted for natural changes, such as orbital decay by satellites, you will not get the correct readings.

[WaxItYourself]

@whodathunkit1960 Mars warming is regional and is related to changing albedo caused by dust storms. (Fenton, 2007, "Global warming and climate forcing by recent albedo

changes on Mars"). The warming on Pluto is related to seasonal variations. Other bodies, such as Europa, are warming as well but those are also caused by factors specific to that particular body such as increasing pressure.

[whodathunkit1960]

@greenman3610

lets see, a AGW truther is going to cite "leading climatologists"? I WONDER what they will say? I wonder what your "spin" will be?

you better make a trip over to albaby's to get your A-game

remember YOU brought the "residual warming" argument to the table

when you apply the concept of "residual warming" to the oceans, the FACT that forced TRAILING effects of things like Temp and CO2 levels REALLY cripple your entire AGW argument

you've BEEN warned, lol

[greenman3610]

@whodathunkit1960

wait a few days. will be updating my "the sun did it crock" video.

for now, you can watch a moronic congressman ask the same question of one of the world's leading climatologists.

watch?v=L2m9SNzxJJA

[whodathunkit1960]

@greenman3610

did you leave your A-game at albaby's

you take the quote "mars climate change may be driven by different factors" to mean that changes there are CLEARLY not driven by SOLAR, oops no gold star! pray tell, if its NOT SOLAR, WHAT would it be driven BY?

please correllate your hallowed "hockey stick" with "sunspot activity" graphs

and you dont get to call "residual warming" on pluto and not factor it in here

sunspots? wait, did you claim there is no correlation to solar output?

[greenman3610]

@whodathunkit1960

"other planets' nonsense

watch?v=BSXgiml5UwM



[whodathunkit1960]

@spacecowboy95

science stands on its own

no, not the "entire scientific comunity", not even close. just the isolated IPCC "climate truther" niche

what data? data massaged by those with VESTED interest in propagating the "AGW myth"? they FREELY ADMIT that they have "adjusted their data", sorry pal, in SCIENCE you dont get to do that! its RAW DATA, or its propaganda

explain HOW you can "adjust data" to support a theory, and not corrupt the entire study?

try "BAD Science Ben Goldacre' on TED

[whodathunkit1960]

@spacecowboy95

97%? sorry pluto ISNT a planet, and science isnt a democracy

all I see is a group of like minded individuals telling each other how WONDERFUL their ideas are, AKA a CIRCLE JERK

please show me a SINGLE instance of one of your vaunted "scientists" who have taken into account Magnetospheric variance in their WONDERFUL models, just ONE would be a nice start

or maybe why OTHER objects in the solar system have shown the SAME "climate change" over the SAME time. curious, isnt it?