Ron Paul Wouldn't Have Voted For The 1964 Civil Rights Act

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,963
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 13, 2011

13 May, 2011 MSNBC

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,175)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @DaNewLeder You are being ignorant, he wants SMALL government, which is very different of not having any government at all, it's how the founding fathers wanted: a limited government. He is not an anarchist! And by the way, the corrupted corporations are the ones that are donating to Mitt and Obama, both are whores of establishment. Ron Paul is the only one anti-establishment and anti-war.

  • People who think local segregation wouldn't ever happen again even if it was allowed aren't minorities themselves.

  • @atheistscepticism You don't have the right to use someone elses property if they don't want you to. You're stupid if you can't see that.

  • He's trying to coerce others into countenancing his racism by employing ambiguity to such an extent that the close-minded many may actually believe him. He seems to not be able to recognise that without the Civil Rights Act there wouldn't be a shred of equality for black people in the US. He pertains to believe in freedom for all- libertarianism should be unconditional- yet without the removal of social injustica there can be no freedom, only a spurious delusion.

  • @heartrocketblast Got nothin' to lose and plenty to gain with the right guy in office, I just don't think RP is the one. Simple as that. We're not going to change each other's minds, so let's just agree to disagree on this one. :)

  • @Gremmie4 Well people often look extreme when they're not trying to pander to everyone or tickle their ears. The truth is often hard to hear... for those who have something to lose.

  • @heartrocketblast I understand, and agree to a certain extent, but this is hardly the only -- or biggest -- case of his being extreme.

  • @Gremmie4 If businesses started denying people business on the basis of their race, everyone would boycott them except perhaps a small handful. It's not really naive idealism as much as just a healthy realization of where people are at, and what effect the idea of liberty and natural rights has. Once people realize they're free and truly free, they want to give it away. This is why blacks started getting more respect after the constitution was written and many of them were liberated in the north

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more