J- xx chinese fighter 5th generation 中国 成都

"Those are the ones that determine the outcome"
determine the outcome? outcome of what? usa losing the war after 15 years?

you send me a regiment battle that determined usa's lost in vietnam war.

so what if i didnt know the number of battles that occured? i was assuming that yes you owed me 320 but you already commented and given me 20 on a previous message so now you owe me 300... if you want to give me 320 then do so idiot...

but the 20 that i stated were REGIMENT OR HIGHER battles.
Not ONE of yours was.
hahahahaha
Like i said, if we won most of the battles and lost the war, then there is obviously something else that ended the war right? MEDIA
the n Vietnamese major general said it himself. Did i send you the url yet?

and you never commented on the fact you completely failed when you said that we had the same causalities. HAHAHAHA EPIC FAIL
Did you catch your mistake, and just wanted to shut up about it or what?

oh and you say americans are smart? watch:

watch?v=fJuNgBkloFE

its probably one of the funniest videos i've seen.

wow idiot! i said the casualties were the same on BOTH SIDES! S. viet/USA side vs N. Viet side.

hahahahahaha we wern't talking about svietnam/u.s. VS nvietnam etc

WE WERE TALKING ABOUT U.S. VS N VIETNAM.
YOU NOOB.

Also, damn that must be sad that canada has a lower average iq than those stupid americans on that vid. Just imagine how stupid canadians are with a lower iq.

S.Viet: 1.4 mil; USA: 360k; N.Viet: 1.77mil
Casualties means they were beaten so bad, that they could not fight anymore. casualties are bigger influence than death, because N.Viet made 1.7mill not able to fight.

I was talking about the vietnam war and USA's military capability not just US vs N.Viet. i am saying the USA side had an ally with the same number of troops as the other side and still couldnt do anythin gafter 15 years!

have you watched the video yet?
watch?v=fJuNgBkloFE

regiment doesnt mean a thing! a battle loss even between 400 people or 30 000 people means your military could not even handle a small fight. and you lost the war because you gave up. the media was bothering you for all that 15 years, but you didnt surrender 2 years after the fight. you had 15 years to fight a small country, yet failed to do so.

?????
casualties of N vietnam(not including civilians)
1,176,000

casualties of U.S.
58,159

what the FUCK do you mean the casualties were the same??
ROTFLMAO
Not only that, but the u.s.had more soldiers than n vietnam, which means they were SUPPOSED to have more casualties, yet the only had 1/20th the amount
OOOOOOOWNED

casualties mean they cannot fight anymore (missing limb, eye, dead, etc!) LOL i cant believe you didn't know that. LOL usa had more soldier doesnt mean they have more casualties. more soldiers means eliminating ememy faster and less time for them to attack your soldiers. which means less casualties. what an ignorant retard!

WHAT?
i will post the casualties again, cause you seem to be retarded
n vietnames
No, casualites generally refer to just deaths you clown. But i will post the wounded+deaths

N vietnamese deaths
1,176,000

U.S. deaths
58,159

and i believe that i first said KILLS not wounded YOU CLOWN