Trophy APS vs. Quick Kill, collateral damage comparison
Uploader Comments (gorf1)
Top Comments
-
Russia aint got shit on Israel, all your Jewish Scientists that made the soviet power are all working in Israel now. Keep selling your junk to the Arabs, no wonder we kick there ass in 6 days.
All Comments (65)
-
wait, are you standing up for the Russians or the Israels?
-
The hell are you talking about? The Arena system is real, it works, and it's a standard outfit for T-90s, especially new T-90s like the T-90A and T-90MS. The trophy system never entered service with the US, but it seems the Israelis know the way to go, they have both reactive armor and APS countermeasure system like Russia, unlike the US military which seems to oppose both ideas.
-
It looks like QK has too many things that could go wrong compared to Trophy. From what I can see Trophy looks like a shotgun or flack gun.
-
Those were different types of at weapons?
-
the rocket is a fly-by rocket. thats a lame test.
-
i carry this and a grenade
-
A great video except for the lack of reference between the two AP systems. Frankly I would put my money on the TROPHY given the success it has had.
-
it think that Active defense systems every were will change the face of the modern battlefield
-
the new trophy version does reload very fast!
-
quick kill is still in development, but they are way behind schedule.
and trophy does work very well. the usa tested it and it was 30 out of 30. in 2011 they repeated another test and compared it to the other aps and trophy was the best.
russia had the arena active defence system in the late seventies, it's safer to crew, it's fitted as standard to t64,s t72,s t80, and t90,s and i think that it,s safe to assume that it has been improved substantualy.
bzorbn 1 year ago
@bzorbn Arena system is not safer than Trophy, on contrary. And it was never operational, Trophy is.
gorf1 1 year ago 23