Atoms, Forces, and Stars Pt. 2 German Version

This is a re-entry of a vid so it can be viewed in Germany.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• atoms
• four forces of nature
• physics
• evolution

[RedGiant81]

Abiogenesis is not SG, sorry, but you don't get to go round making up your own definitions of what things are. SG was the belief that organisms like mice and maggots could appear fully formed! There is nothing in the law of biogenesis that goes against microbial life forms forming from complex chemistry. This is a flat out fail.

[stevebee92653]

@RedGiant81 What on Earth are you doing on this vid discussing abiogenesis? At any rate, Abio is easily testable, and it fails every test, but it remains a fake science. If you want to believe a fake, have at it. Why brag to me?

[alfamale05]

We actually don't have to imagine what such a universe would look like because there are neighboring galaxies that are life inhibiting due to the fact that such galaxies contain a sun that emits harmful radioactive chemicals making it impossible for any organism to develop.

[stevebee92653]

@alfamale05 Galaxies contain hundreds of billions of suns, each with their own characteristics. The odds that a percentage of them are amenable to and have living organisms is high. Also, the fact that a majority of stars are double and triple reduces those odds, unfortunately.

[MaximusArurealius]

@WildCatsKitten1 he fled in terror. hahahaa

[IcemanSupaFly]

@noiseache we all believe in the scientific method. we are waiting for the evos to use it to show some evo evidence instead of speculation and outright lies.

[WildCatsKitten1]

@neckache

"Faith is the complete opposite of science"

Faith is defined in merriam webster as belief in something for which there is no proof.

There is no proof for multiverses but there are scientists that still postulate that they exist

In fact what proof do you have that a living organism arose from dead matter all on its own in a natural enviroment?

Abiogenesis just like multiverses are believed with faith just like darwinian just so stories that you have faith in.

You idiot.

[WildCatsKitten1]

@noiseache

Strictly speaking, it is improper for Darwimps to use the phrase “evolve to” as an action that an organism performs toward a goal, In Darwin Land organisms do not "evolve to" do anything. It is not some force with a goal, but would be the outcome of purposeless and mindless processes starting with random mutations – that is the core dogma of the Darwin Party.

Your own pressupositions do not allow you to talk about organisms conspiring to do such a thing.

[MaximusArurealius]

@noiseache I guess I should go easy on you considering that your mum broke your egg yoke this morning and ruined your whole day. Now calm yourself and see if you can be coherent?

[MaximusArurealius]

@noiseache "So you deny that blah blah blah blah ad nauseam" Is that all you can do? Rave about denial of totally irrelevant things? And accusations of sockpuppetry? Challenge? What challenge a-hole? Zero facts? Back up to what? The fact that you rant on and on and make one asinine assertion after another? The main thing I see as pathetic is your ability to communicate with the English language. Or is it that you're having your period?

[MaximusArurealius]

@noiseache Damn, no wonder you have that name. You can bitch worse than any woman I have ever heard. Scientific method? The evolutionists threw that out a long time ago. Even before they came up with this completely fabricated idea of "common ancestor." And then there's the latest theory of "everything is transitioning." NOW that IS some realllll scientific method. The funniest is their dinos evolving into birds theory failure. HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR