Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

► 2011 Kia Optima - CRASH TEST ★★★★★

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
90,059
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 22, 2010

2011 Kia Optima named "Top Safety Pick" by Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

Building on the momentum of Kia's growing lineup of new generation vehicles, the all-new 2011 Kia Optima midsize sedan has received the highest possible crash safety rating of "Good" in all four tests conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) in the U.S. and has been recognized as a "Top Safety Pick," the top award handed down by the organization.

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • some stupid ass think the front looks horrible after the crash?

    It totally doesnt matter how the car looks like after the crash

    It matters only for the driver's safety

  • For everyone that's complaining about how the "front looks after this crash".....you're all dumbasses. Go to the IIHS channel on here or their website and take a look at all the other crashed cars. Or for example, watch the video for the 2009 Volvo C30 crash (also a 'Top Safety Pick') and notice how the A-pillar bends just like this Kia's. And then ask yourselves, how would your clunkers look after a crash?

see all

All Comments (62)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • safer than volvo

  • The crash might look bad, but it's actually better for the driver. Those zones are simply "crush zones" which absorb more of the impact over a longer period of time ... thus reducing the effect on the driver.

  • I don't crash in the first place.

  • @ak5504 I have little faith that most of the YouTube population could even conceive your point That isn't to say that you are unclear.

  • @ak5504 your point is a good one - it's better for the front to crumple than not - but I think you meant Force = Impulse/Time, in which case extending the time does decrease the force that needs to be applied for a fixed change in momentum. Or stated in a way people might be more familiar with (F=ma), if the crumple zone is larger/longer, then the rate of deceleration is less, and so the force exerted is also less.

  • @kent1105 Because sometimes, the head will snap to the side, and in many cases, the head DOES hit the side window. 

  • Just remember what these guys were building only a few years ago.

    Well done, Kia/Hyundai.

  • How come the side curtain airbags are activated even the car is only having a front impact

  • this right !

  • @ak5504 f=impulse x time? thats not what i learned in physics is this somekind of higher physics?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more