Six Climate Realist Specialists Speak Out

Some highlights from specialists speaking at the Climate Realists Conference this year, near Cambridge in the UK.
http://www.youtube.com/theclimaterealist - http://repealtheact.co.uk

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Climate
• Climate Change Act
• Phillip Foster
• James Dent
• Roger Helmer
• Piers Corbyn
• Dr Axel Morner
• Austin Phillips

[ryanshaunkelly]

Government is playing dumb about the 'weather'

just like they still play dumb about 911 false flag

[britpod]

1 Climate scientist who's entire career and income depends on the AGW myth, dislikes this video.

[meercatdotcom]

Great video of a bunch of cracks and looneys gathered togetther lecturing us on how they know more than the experts.

[sesamestreetgang]

The 1st man is a conservative member of British Parliament

The 2nd man is an architect and urban developer

The 3rd is a meteorologist and astrophysicist who runs "Weather Action" criticized for it's inaccurate forecasts and "gambling/betting" on forecasts

The 4th man is a Reverend

The 5th is a Geologist known for his belief in "dowsing" and advocating that "dowsing" courses be taught at universities

The 6th is a hydrology consultant

NONE of them are climatologists, LOL!!!

[kimdpetersen]

@stvbrsn My personal problem with this argument is the basic assumption that "tax must be evil" and that they bend facts to make it "appear" to be correct.

If you are against doing anything about CO2 - then argue that we're better off adapting. Don't argue that "science must be wrong" because it clashes with your ideology. If you reject on ideology - then you are little better than ... say .. creationists.

[kimdpetersen]

@stvbrsn I'm certainly not "married to" anything. Most of my reading is the "sceptical" literature. Its there i find the inspiration to read up on the scientfic literature. You might say that it is the "sceptical arguments" that make me confident. Arguments such as these are so basically wrong when you dig down into them, that you have to wonder why no "real" sceptical argument is presented.

[stvbrsn]

@kimdpetersen It appears you're a different Kim Petersen after all. No matter, i am only trying to help broaden the perception of these issues in what little way I can. I am not married to any ideology and I don't have an agenda. Ultimately, my purpose is to be a sharpening stone for Occam's razor. All I ask is that you thoroughly question why you are so (seemingly-I don't know you) attached to the notion of human driven climate change.

[stvbrsn]

@kimdpetersen Ok well, I'm not really here to argue fine points, so I'll defer to you. I do not disagree that human industrial activity degrades the environment in general. I just feel AGW theory is being used to slam legislation down our throats (main complaint of the folks in the clip) that creates markets in support of a fiat monetary system that can no longer exist without such bubbles being created. The longer they keep adding cards to the house, the more people get hurt when it comes down.

[stvbrsn]

@kimdpetersen One last thing (and I do mean last, I'm turning my attentions elsewhere- know that if you respond I wont see it, so it'll just be mental masturbation on your part). If you're the Kim Petersen of Dissident Voice, I'm disappointed that you can't see beyond the paradigm of this debate to the bigger (monetary) picture. Implementation of the AGW agenda will only result in more wealth concentrated into fewer hands.

A problem cannot be solved at the level where it was created -Einstein

[kimdpetersen]

@stvbrsn Sorry but to my knowledge - *no* scientist has shown these "well-established long term natural cycles". And i'm fairly well read on this topic.

As for "the fact" as you call it. I'd say that it belongs in a conspiracy theory and not in reality. Its not a fact, its a conjecture.

[kimdpetersen]

@stvbrsn, further if you Google "Volcano CO2" then you would know that it was wrong. Here's a quote:

Iceland's Eyjafjoell volcano is emitting between 150,000 and 300,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) per day, a figure placing it in the same emissions league as a small-to-medium European economy, experts said on Monday

Just to illustrate the point.

[kimdpetersen]

@stvbrsn Sorry but your "Krakatoa released more CO2" is wrong. Krakatoa didn't increase atmospheric CO2 significantly - and neither does any other Volcano. For Krakatoa - look up "Law Dome CO2" where you can see the "non-existing" effect. The Volcano in Chile is significantly smaller than the one in Iceland, and i'm sorry to tell you that these do not release significant amounts of CO2. You can check this in the "Mauna Loa" records (ie. no peaks from Volc. erup.).