Pulp Interview
Top Comments
All Comments (52)
-
Yes, and no offense to Blur or Oasis. I like them too, but they don't quite have the depth that Pulp possesses.
-
Jarvis is a funny man. Pulp are so fucking great :')
-
mhmmm cocker
-
@avenlac Oh the irony. Turn the light off on your way out.
-
@AshtonArcher America are a great nation?
-
@avenlac Fail.
-
@AshtonArcher Pulp were one band as identified by your reference 'a great band' hence, singular. Thank you. Don't get up.
-
@AshtonArcher Yeah, you're right. Sorry mate, both forms are correct. I'm from Australia and I did a little bit of research and you're right.
-
@seviwesuohetarepsed Not really. As someone said earlier both forms are grammatically correct. Just that the form of 'is' is more prevelant in American English - it just sounds wrong to English ears. But I'm not wrong.
-
@AshtonArcher Actually, you're wrong. Pulp is a band and therefore when talking about the band, they must be singular, not plural, if you were referring to the members of the band, that would be different. The members of Pulp are great. But the band is only one band. So Pulp is a great band. Not are.
pulp is a great band, i rate them higher than blur and oasis
nameherejony 3 years ago 47
Wouldn't it indeed be IS, because Pulp is the collective word for the members in the band. The comment is about the band as a whole, which is one thing, not about the individual members?
M4A0S7H7 3 years ago 14