Do Kaysing or Rogan Discredit the First LRO Photo of the Apollo 15 Landing Site?
Uploader Comments (philwebb59)
All Comments (44)
-
@philwebb59 my aunt, she is very sick ;-(
-
The proof has been in the public domain for decades, and is still studied today. Apollo was massive; videos and pictures taken, tracking telemetry from Earth, the astronauts that went there, 60 (sixty!) scientific experiments left on the surface of the Moon and all the data received from them, 840 pounds of rocks and 6 foot long intact core tube samples brought back, satellites launched from SIM bays into lunar orbit, reflectors left at the landing sites, etc. etc.
-
@philwebb59 Yeah, no kidding and, with the tech available in the 60's and early 70's would have been a nightmare! These kooks really don't have a grasp on any kind of reality.
-
funnily enough, how much will nASA pay for E-ELT not to be turned towards Apolo 11 landing site?Did they already decide to take part in that project and `share technology`?
if these moon landing reall did happen then why is their not the proofe after all these year?
marshalllucky 1 week ago
@marshalllucky "why is their not the proofe?" I don't know. What would you consider proofe?
philwebb59 1 week ago
Phil: I can't tell you how hard I laughed at the idea that Kaysing insisted that the astronauts should have planted charges in the dust to create a dust cloud so we can see it from earth. Too funny! I don't mean to distract from the rest of the content of this video, but seeing that made me laugh pretty heartily. Also, if you go out to where dirt bike riders go and ride, you don't see much of a difference in the area where a dirt bike passed through, other than the tire tracks. CTs are dumb.
AlienShadow5000 11 months ago
@AlienShadow5000 Kaysing had several ideas on how the astronauts could have let us know they were there. Most everything would be argued away by modern moon hoaxers as being done by robots.
philwebb59 11 months ago
@philwebb59 That is hilarious. And, you're absolutely right they would try and pull that. That would be hilarious if they tried that though, since robotics back then were not as sophisticated as they are today. And, one would have to challenge them on that and ask: if they can send robots to the moon, why couldn't they send humans to the moon? :)
AlienShadow5000 11 months ago
@AlienShadow5000 I used robots in the 80's. It was a challenge even then with the "sophisticated" hardware and microprocessors available at the time. We learned how to use them, and not use them, by making mistakes. That was rough enough to attempt from across the room. I can't imagine trying it from 385,000 km away.
philwebb59 11 months ago