Fur Hag Effigy

Effigy of Fur Hag with the defitintion of what a fur hag looks like. Each year, millions of animals including cats and dogs are gassed, trapped, analy electrocuted, beaten, and skinned alive just for fur hags to try and look glamerous. In reality, these people look like ignorant assholes with blood on their hands.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• effigy
• portland
• oregon
• fur
• hag
• no
• animal
• rights
• liberation
• anarchist
• burning
• protest
• indymedia
• imc
• video

[trixiebella1111]

Ha, silly, but I like the chant. lol. I can't stand whore woman who wae fur, they ar so ugly. It's like snow white attacking all the animal inthe woods and ripping off their skin and wearing it. Def not a princess.

lol. " Tell me what a fur hag looks like.. this is what a fur hag looks like" lol lol lol

[Hundefell]

Boycott Olympic Games:

Use your freedom of free speech!

Send protesting Emails to the President of China:

Act NOW!

[SniperSurkov]

stupid socialist

[Marc3c]

Well that acomplished a lot. History has demonstrated, time & time again that hatred & dehuminizing the Other has brought us lasting peace & understanding. Where would we be if mindless chanting feeding our prejudices & stoking our anger hadn't advanced our knowledge that no one ever emulates kindness and compassion... that the best way to get someone to listen to you & examine their conscience is to insult & threaten them? When will people learn? HUMAN KINDNESS SUCKS! BIGOTRY RULES! YEAH!

[GoldenWolfStudios]

@RioBaby2887 Doing things that benefit domestic animals in the long run is called "Animal Welfare". Look it up some time. And if you have prior knowledge on what you speak about, then why do you support PeTA, a group that provides unnessecary euthenasia on rescued pets. I understand you don't like the idea of skinning animals, but it happens, and it might not stop soon. And not all of it is done with animals alive by animal cruelty, but rather the animals are already slaughtered or euthenized.

[GoldenWolfStudios]

@RioBaby2887 And since you constantly persist in keeping up a flame-war in the comments here, keep in mind that PeTA themselves euthenize animals for no reason, and have a lower adoption to euthenization rate than any humane society. Now normally, I would think twice about supporting a group that does THAT behind their supporters' backs like you, but I guess I'm wrong. So apparently, you support groups that perform unnessecary euthenasia, but not people that wear fur. Hypociritical much?

[RioBaby2887]

@GoldenWolfStudios OOHH GOSH...I suppose you missed the whole point of the comment. I would love to make some decisions for animals as long as it is for their benefit.I'm sure if animal could win against man with a butchering knife and the intention to kill they would.But skinning animals for their skin happens everyday.It is a terrible thing!I don't understand how you do not see it.And by the way, I have prior knowledge of what I speak.Otherwise I wouldn't have commented on your post.

[GoldenWolfStudios]

@RioBaby2887 Oh, and another thing. PeTA not only acts racist by applying human morality to humans for no good reason, but is also hypocritical. They support spaying and nuetering pets, although that completely goes against their ideas of applying human morality to that of animals. I mean, if they think it's wrong to milk cows but not humans, WHY would they support the sexual restrictions normally practiced on household pets? And they're permanent operations, I might add.

[GoldenWolfStudios]

@RioBaby2887 Sure, you could say there's a fur trade practicing animal cruelty in China, which if true, is of course a bad thing. But not all fur farms work that way. Also, blaming ALL of China for their fur trade is like blaming ALL of the U.S. for the KKK. Your arguement about that is flawed because of that.

[GoldenWolfStudios]

@RioBaby2887 Echoing half of my arguement isn't compelling information against it. People could have already read it, we don't need you showing what I said a second time. And point of advice: Don't apply human morality to animals for no reason. You're showing racial prejudice for deciding what happens to animals with no good prior knowledge other then applying YOUR morality to them. Not their personal morals, YOURS.

[RioBaby2887]

@ChristopherNiari123 You sound pretty ignorant!! "cos"??? Go back to school and learn some real vocabulary and while you're at it, get a new brain too.

[RioBaby2887]

@italian3o8p Shut up!! You sound dumb!!