http://www.ThisIsReality.org
In reality, there is no such thing as clean coal. Join Reality. We're going to challenge the clean coal myth and make sure misleading articles, false statements and o...
http://www.ThisIsReality.org In reality, there is no such thing as clean coal. Join Reality. We're going to challenge the clean coal myth and make sure misleading articles, false statements and other hype don't go unanswered.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
If we took 1 tillion dollars the cost of the wars in you know where. 1 trillion/4 million (estimated cost of scale for a commercial one wind turbine) would net 25 billion wind turbines. One wind turbine can generate 2.5MWh electricity. 2.5MWh can power 350 homes in a northern cold state. 25 billion X 250 homes? I think that pretty much covers the US needs for power. Just having fun here, don't shoot the messenger. Coal is abundant yes, but we need to focus on nuclear, wind, solar, geotherm.
Sorry, but coal doesn't just affect the local area. Air has no borders, and the increasing CO2 affects everyone, albeit some regions are affect more greatly.
Also, impacts aren't always felt immediately, actually practically never. Climate isn't like the weather. It's not instantaneous. It is trends and patterns that spread over decades, not a single year or whatnot.
I would talk to someone who lives in the Powder River Basin, and they will tell you about the impact on the land.
One of the best ways to save the environment is to elect Officials that will focus on reducing immigration. In America, nearly all the population growth in the last 40 years has been via immigration, over 100 million more and we are on track to go to 500 million in a few decades. The world does not need 300 million more American consumers and America does not need 300 million more immigrants. Go to Numbersusa for more info on immigration and to fax your senators for free.
Alright now I have to ask a question: What's the difference between a mine producing "black water" and natural erosion through a coal bed releasing EVERYTHING into the stream?
Natural erosion rarely causes a tidal wave of destruction when left unchecked, erosion doesn't systematically separate the most toxic elements for stockpiling (the coal industry does, to reduce atmospheric emissions), erosion also releases those substances at a much slower rate, at relatively non-toxic levels, allowing natural dilution and biological processes to fix the chemicals to the ground. The levels found at tailings are deadly to most lifeforms except a few extremophillic bacteria.
I'll go back to my coal-mine-next-to-a-national-p ark statement. the mine is virtually INVISIBLE even down hill. Real-world scenarios trump your propagandist facts. and all a coal mine does is dig the coal out of the hillside, dump the waste rock overburden, and ship it out. Coal is not further processed at the mine itself. there is no "separation of toxic elements for stockpiling"...it's putting naturally-formed coal into a pile to be sold. No chemical operations are done on it. learn something.
So far I've never heard of clean coal technology being put to use, if it was, I think the coal companies would be going a lot more advertising about it. I think the fact that it isn't advertised hints towards the technology being propaganda.
Search for "A Future For Clean Coal?" and decide who you want to believe.
I agree. How about no coal. Why not use truly clean energy like solar, wind, and geothermal? I bet they spend more on advertising "clean coal" than actual research. And furthermore, I love how they think that burrying the CO2 they are able to capture underneath the earth will solve the problem.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Also, impacts aren't always felt immediately, actually practically never. Climate isn't like the weather. It's not instantaneous. It is trends and patterns that spread over decades, not a single year or whatnot.
I would talk to someone who lives in the Powder River Basin, and they will tell you about the impact on the land.
In America, nearly all the population growth in the last 40 years has been via immigration, over 100 million more and we are on track to go to 500 million in a few decades. The world does not need 300 million more American consumers and America does not need 300 million more immigrants. Go to Numbersusa for more info on immigration and to fax your senators for free.
Search for "A Future For Clean Coal?" and decide who you want to believe.