Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Clean Coal: This Is Reality

http://www.ThisIsReality.org In reality, there is no such thing as clean coal. Join Reality. We're going to challenge the clean coal myth and make sure misleading articles, false statements and o...  
 
Customize

More From: thisisreality

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
282 ratings
Sign in to rate
69,749 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (454)   Options

Loading...
obiwannotanikan (1 month ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Actually, sh*t is much cleaner than coal. Maneur! Compost! Haha.
obiwannotanikan (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Sorry, but coal doesn't just affect the local area. Air has no borders, and the increasing CO2 affects everyone, albeit some regions are affect more greatly.

Also, impacts aren't always felt immediately, actually practically never. Climate isn't like the weather. It's not instantaneous. It is trends and patterns that spread over decades, not a single year or whatnot.

I would talk to someone who lives in the Powder River Basin, and they will tell you about the impact on the land.
obiwannotanikan (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
CO? I thought we were talking about CO2 Sorry, but making a fire isn't the same thing as industries burning coal as much as we do.
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
Wafflepudding (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
That blackwater (essentially coal tailings) are impounded on artificial dams since companies don't have a legal obligation to treat them, and treating them would make coal power generation a lot more expensive (which is why energy companies lobby against regulation forcing them to do it). An example of the consequences of that policy is the TVA Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill, back in December 2008. CO2 sequestration would also be expensive. Coal can be either cheap OR clean.
TJvigilante (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Alright now I have to ask a question: What's the difference between a mine producing "black water" and natural erosion through a coal bed releasing EVERYTHING into the stream?
Wafflepudding (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Natural erosion rarely causes a tidal wave of destruction when left unchecked, erosion doesn't systematically separate the most toxic elements for stockpiling (the coal industry does, to reduce atmospheric emissions), erosion also releases those substances at a much slower rate, at relatively non-toxic levels, allowing natural dilution and biological processes to fix the chemicals to the ground. The levels found at tailings are deadly to most lifeforms except a few extremophillic bacteria.
TJvigilante (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I'll go back to my coal-mine-next-to-a-national-p ark statement. the mine is virtually INVISIBLE even down hill. Real-world scenarios trump your propagandist facts. and all a coal mine does is dig the coal out of the hillside, dump the waste rock overburden, and ship it out. Coal is not further processed at the mine itself. there is no "separation of toxic elements for stockpiling"...it's putting naturally-formed coal into a pile to be sold. No chemical operations are done on it. learn something.
ObsidianKnight90 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So far I've never heard of clean coal technology being put to use, if it was, I think the coal companies would be going a lot more advertising about it. I think the fact that it isn't advertised hints towards the technology being propaganda.

Search for "A Future For Clean Coal?" and decide who you want to believe.
obiwannotanikan (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I agree. How about no coal. Why not use truly clean energy like solar, wind, and geothermal? I bet they spend more on advertising "clean coal" than actual research. And furthermore, I love how they think that burrying the CO2 they are able to capture underneath the earth will solve the problem.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.