Amnesty International members participated in the Budapest Gay Pride march in solidarity with Hungarian lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people, who continue to face widespread hostility and discrimination in the country. Amnesty International believes that this year's Budapest Pride provides an excellent opportunity to counter intolerance and celebrate the rights and dignity of LGBT people in Hungary and across Europe.
I wanna know where to get the earrings at 1:00 and 1:44 :D
jennfarrsuperstar 6 months ago
@Elephantintheroom01
"Your faith in gays"
What 'faith'? What are you talking about? Y
"you think that having a little debate is dictatorship."
No, that's not what I said. You see, this is the problem we have. Either you have a poor understanding of English and/or you're stupid. I said that you are a dictator because you want to control how other people live their lives.
Mattyb88ful 7 months ago
@Mattyb88ful "Why must people... justify their lifestyle choices?"
Why do justify that i'm not a dictator? Or the re-incarnation of jeezas
Because people DO have to justify themselves. Theres no human right that says you can be illogical.
Assuming that everything you do is right is blind faith. Your faith in gays is just as flawed as the christians faith in god. Neither of you explain your evidence.
Also, this is why you are mistaken, you think that having a little debate is dictatorship.
Elephantintheroom01 7 months ago
@Elephantintheroom01
"Its the PRO gay argument that should be explaining when there is enough genes in the pool... to justify their choices."
No, not at all. Why must people, gay or straight, justify their lifestyle choices? If I don't want to have kids I won't have kids. It's my life. It's my body. This is what I was talking about earlier you being a dictator. You want to control how other people live their lives. It's none of your business.
Mattyb88ful 7 months ago
@Mattyb88ful I am interested in the answer but i'll have to turn that one back on you.
Its the PRO gay argument that should be explaining when there is enough genes in the pool... to justify their choices. Marko? polo, marko?, polo.
FISH OUTA WATER!
Elephantintheroom01 7 months ago
@Elephantintheroom01
"No, i've already showd you a video on overpopulation falsity."
That video was a joke. It didn't even touch on the issue of resources.
"How much is enough? How much is healthy?"
Why don't you tell us? After all, you're the one using the gene/reproduction argument to bash homosexuality.
Mattyb88ful 7 months ago
@Mattyb88ful Once again, the punch and judy argument "ohh yes it is" over population.
No, i've already showd you a video on overpopulation falsity.
"Was 0.5 billion, now 7 billion, then 12 billion"
All i read here is 7 is higher than 5 and 12 is higher than 7. Do you really know what the max sustainable population for the planet ear is?
"More than enough reproduction is taking place"
How much is enough? How much is healthy? Now your making the pleasant = good argument.
Elephantintheroom01 7 months ago
@Elephantintheroom01
We do have overpopulation. The world population was just around 0.5 billion half a century ago. Now it's almost 7 billion and on its way to 12 billion a century. More than enough reproduction is taking place to throw out the window your 'reducing the number of humans passing on genes will reduce our success rate' claim.
Mattyb88ful 7 months ago
@Mattyb88ful @Mattyb88ful Continued A1
Having less humans is akin to having less neurons in a brian, you lose thinking power. Your collective genetic evolution gets smaller.
"naturalistic fallacy" Nonono this is a straw man and disanalogies, i strongly encourage you to read the statments as if i'm not making a 'pleasant=good' argument because then you may see my actual points. As i've said before i'm making a 'healthy=good' argument. Cognative dissonance much?
Elephantintheroom01 7 months ago
@Mattyb88ful "This doesn't mean we should reproduce." ...perhapse, but if every human has a chance of evolving a usefull gene and, ideally speaking, only the strongest genes are domenant, then, reducing the number of humans passing on genes will reduce our success rate.
And, concidering that we have a falling birthrate, and there is no such thing as overpopulation, just starvation. And that this low brithrate will create economic stress as retirment happens, especially gays...
Continued A1.
Elephantintheroom01 7 months ago