Amnesty International shows solidarity with Budapest Pride

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
744 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 27, 2011

Amnesty International members participated in the Budapest Gay Pride march in solidarity with Hungarian lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people, who continue to face widespread hostility and discrimination in the country. Amnesty International believes that this year's Budapest Pride provides an excellent opportunity to counter intolerance and celebrate the rights and dignity of LGBT people in Hungary and across Europe.

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I wanna know where to get the earrings at 1:00 and 1:44 :D

  • @Elephantintheroom01

    "Your faith in gays"

    What 'faith'? What are you talking about? Y

    "you think that having a little debate is dictatorship."

    No, that's not what I said. You see, this is the problem we have. Either you have a poor understanding of English and/or you're stupid. I said that you are a dictator because you want to control how other people live their lives.

  • @Mattyb88ful "Why must people... justify their lifestyle choices?"

    Why do justify that i'm not a dictator? Or the re-incarnation of jeezas

    Because people DO have to justify themselves. Theres no human right that says you can be illogical.

    Assuming that everything you do is right is blind faith. Your faith in gays is just as flawed as the christians faith in god. Neither of you explain your evidence.

    Also, this is why you are mistaken, you think that having a little debate is dictatorship.

  • @Elephantintheroom01

    "Its the PRO gay argument that should be explaining when there is enough genes in the pool... to justify their choices."

    No, not at all. Why must people, gay or straight, justify their lifestyle choices? If I don't want to have kids I won't have kids. It's my life. It's my body. This is what I was talking about earlier you being a dictator. You want to control how other people live their lives. It's none of your business.

  • @Mattyb88ful I am interested in the answer but i'll have to turn that one back on you.

    Its the PRO gay argument that should be explaining when there is enough genes in the pool... to justify their choices. Marko? polo, marko?, polo.

    FISH OUTA WATER!

  • @Elephantintheroom01

    "No, i've already showd you a video on overpopulation falsity."

    That video was a joke. It didn't even touch on the issue of resources.

    "How much is enough? How much is healthy?"

    Why don't you tell us? After all, you're the one using the gene/reproduction argument to bash homosexuality.

  • @Mattyb88ful Once again, the punch and judy argument "ohh yes it is" over population.

    No, i've already showd you a video on overpopulation falsity.

    "Was 0.5 billion, now 7 billion, then 12 billion"

    All i read here is 7 is higher than 5 and 12 is higher than 7. Do you really know what the max sustainable population for the planet ear is?

    "More than enough reproduction is taking place"

    How much is enough? How much is healthy? Now your making the pleasant = good argument.

  • @Elephantintheroom01

    We do have overpopulation. The world population was just around 0.5 billion half a century ago. Now it's almost 7 billion and on its way to 12 billion a century. More than enough reproduction is taking place to throw out the window your 'reducing the number of humans passing on genes will reduce our success rate' claim.

  • @Mattyb88ful @Mattyb88ful Continued A1

    Having less humans is akin to having less neurons in a brian, you lose thinking power. Your collective genetic evolution gets smaller.

    "naturalistic fallacy" Nonono this is a straw man and disanalogies, i strongly encourage you to read the statments as if i'm not making a 'pleasant=good' argument because then you may see my actual points. As i've said before i'm making a 'healthy=good' argument. Cognative dissonance much?

  • @Mattyb88ful "This doesn't mean we should reproduce." ...perhapse, but if every human has a chance of evolving a usefull gene and, ideally speaking, only the strongest genes are domenant, then, reducing the number of humans passing on genes will reduce our success rate.

    And, concidering that we have a falling birthrate, and there is no such thing as overpopulation, just starvation. And that this low brithrate will create economic stress as retirment happens, especially gays...

    Continued A1.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more