mandelbrot fractal deep zoom 2 2^637 (HD)

this zooms in to 2^637 or 5.7 * 10^191 which took my computer about 30 hours to render through fractal extreme x64 on a dual core 3.16 gigahertz processor. doable because of where I zoomed in to. Also, as deep as it goes, I admit this may not be the most interesting, but it does have a couple cool patterns, and there will be some much cooler zooms coming in the future, so please subscribe if you like these.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• fractal
• deep
• zoom
• 2^637
• fractals
• mandelbrot

[AngryFishM0nger]

hey, i was just wondering what this is? I understand you zoom in a lot... but what's the whole scene about cause i've seen loads of these videos posted and i dont understand what they are.... please explain?

[SethComposerGuy]

@AngryFishM0nger this is a fractal that is, a geometric pattern that replicates itself continually the smaller it gets. the interesting thing about the Mandelbrot fractal is that the pattern gets more and more complex the more you zoom in. Not only that, but for every new area you zoom in to this fractal, you're going to see something slightly different.

Anyway, look it up on Wikipedia. as it gives you a more thorough view of what a fractal is.

[numcaps2]

Is this the farthest zoom of any fractal recorded? No others on YT at least.

[SethComposerGuy]

@numcaps2 this is not the farthest. I found one that zooms to 2^915 ( just fav'd)

[ftlqed]

It's famous that you got to the bottom, so there is a scale, like atoms. But, it probably wasn't very accurate being roundable. You need to have some decimal places zero's as a buffer. A few thousand transforms can do the same thing as infinite steps in a fractal. Like consider storing a divide as A and B with some C to recall the two in 32 bit, the rounding error can grow and shrink. Thats why I built the 684 method for various congruencies from channelling.

[ladygagafan1002002]

i love fractals they're so beautiful

[TaterGumfries]

Thanks for not usin techno music.

[gaoyubao]

loved it!

[AngryFishM0nger]

@SethComposerGuy okay thanks! i'll take a look at it, sounds complicated.

[Lineridarz]

there was not much point of putting the fact that it was 3.16 ghz down in the info, ghz is pretty much useless these days.