HIV AIDS Denialism: Answering the Perth Group's Arguments

HIV/AIDS Denialism is 'tinfoil hat' conspiracy science. Their tactics, like those of intelligent design, are to constantly try to poke holes in a theory supported by evidence. They present no experimental evidence of their own, but claim victory when their challenges are not immediately responded to.

The Perth Group has two permanent members:
Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos, who has a B.S. in Nuclear Physics
Valender F Turner, who is an ER doctor.
Neither has ever done any HIV research.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• HIV
• AIDS
• Denialist
• skeptic
• dissident
• Perth
• Group
• evidence
• testing
• genetics
• virus
• retrovirus
• conspiracy

[lipin007i]

why are you only targeting the "Perth group" there are many other doctors who deny aids hypothesis, and are to be listened to, and yes one of the reasons that we do not find there research papers on HIV is because, no leading science journal is ready to publish them.

[C0nc0rdance]

@lipin007i

I'm sorry you feel that way. I still sometimes attend Keystone Symposia on virology, and I've never once met an HIV/AIDS denialist there. I would be very interested to be introduced to a active research virologist who doubted the existence of human-tropic lentiviruses or their ability to cause disease.

"Heresy" in science is usually pretty interesting when it's tied to enigmatic data. The trouble here is that there's no meat to the denialist position.

[Thinkagain6]

House of numbers & house of numbers bonus extras documentary on youtube, explain everything

[hitcan79]

Like i've said before I like these video's you do on this subject man, I hope someone does on on that Asshole Liam Scheff, I can't stand that cocky little bastard

[TheHolyMongolEmpire]

AIDs deniers are just like idiot creationists. Except I dont understand why they deny AIDs. Its not like idiot creationists who deny reality due to religion. WTF, I just dont understand.

[TheKitch2]

@perther3 Borderline libel? Not if it's true

[sunaru1]

@JJTechnologies I don't understand you. You seem to accept the evidence that there are 9-10 HIV proteins but you also belng to the group that says HIV does not exist. Please explain.

[JJTechnologies]

@Quizoid I don't understand what this changes? It's nothing new and it all comes back to the same flawed concept of p24 and what about the rest? Why are they so obsessed about p24? becuase it's the only protein Montagnier and Gallo had + supposed RT (btw p24 doesn't have rt, only p51 and p66, which they obviously don't care about). Virus doesn't have 1 or 2 protein, but far as I remember 9-10. This rant doesn't change a damn thing from what they've been saying all along. Zero.