"Climate Denial Crock of the Week" is the video series that takes on the myths of Climate Change Deniers.
http://www.youtube.com/user...
This is the video that Arch Denier Anthony Watts (wattsupwit...
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
As the earth cools, as Jan 09 artic ice is more than Jan 2000 according to satellite photo, all they can do is say, "The debate is over. There's a consensus. Anyone who questions us is crazy" while it snows in DC and Dallas. They are getting desperate. They got caught cheating and defrauding the public, the temps are dropping and they have to get that money now before they lose every scientist not on the take.
Do you mean the scientists given the cooked statistics hiding the decline in temps for 40 years last centurey while C02 went up, or the 30,000 scientists suing Al Gore? The ones fired for telling the IPCC they couldnt use their name because it was faux science with cooked numbers? It never ceases to amaze me when people are caught lying and cheating and the tools who are blind to it. They wouldnt cheat if they had a legitimate case. Fact - the earth is cooling.
Shame there is no direct proof of man made global warming as a few 100 ppm increase in CO2 in the lab has no effect, nada, none, nothing, zero. Now 200,000 ppm increase does raise temp a few C but that is from .01% to 20%. Now the IPCC claims their virtual incomplete positive loopbacked biased models show CO2 has an amplifying effect over time, problem is these BS models could not predict the last 10 years so now we are to believe the can predict 100s of years out?
The IPCC does claim the current temp rise must be man because the cant explain it, but they cant explain any of the 100s of drastic and sudden temp changes seen in the GISP and Vostok ice cores since the last ice age, as much as 3 degree C in 200 years is common but the IPCC makes no mention of this data and simply ignores it in their 4th report as they want you to believe any temp change is abnormal, that is a lie. See the ice cores graphs at my site, same as my name.
what about all those gullibe scientists who still accept AGW? Maybe, just maybe, you will one day realize you have been deluded by others into thinking "climategate" is something it aint.
Why doesn't Al Gore debate Monckton? you mean you haven't figured it out? Ask yourself this: why would Al Gore, who is world famous, want to give Monckton, who is not, free publicity? What does Gore have to gain from such a thing?
btw Monckton won't debate me in public for the same reason.
Even after climategate, and hockystick charts that deal in hundreds of years instead of the charts that show co2 levels over thousands of years, the gullible youth of today are still buying this AGW nonsense put forward by pitchman Al Gore, who is a proven liar. There is very good reason he will not debate Lord Christopher Monckton or anyone else who knows the FACTS. Human activity has a very low impact on climate. The unregulatable sun is by far the dominant force. Greenpeace=Commie, Stooge
"It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." David Rockefellar, apparently also not a fan of the popular vote.
"We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the rule of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders." George H Bush. UN Founders, The Rockefellars, JP Morgan, Chase Manhattan, Alger Hiss
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Why doesn't Al Gore debate Monckton? you mean you haven't figured it out? Ask yourself this: why would Al Gore, who is world famous, want to give Monckton, who is not, free publicity? What does Gore have to gain from such a thing?
btw Monckton won't debate me in public for the same reason.
Human activity has a very low impact on climate. The unregulatable sun is by far the dominant force.
Greenpeace=Commie, Stooge