Sotomayor Address Abortion Rights

During the third day of her confirmation hearing, Sonia Sotomayor addresses abortion rights. She also delivers a dig to an old boss. Well played, judge.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• sotomayor
• sonia sotomayor
• cornyn
• john cornyn
• sotomayor hearings
• abortion
• abortion rights

[BlameRepublicans]

OK so now you *finally* admit that YOU DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT MY RIGHTS. You want to FORCE your agenda on me regardless of the impact on my rights.

See? ***THAT'S*** why people like you are so dangerous. If we let you - you would take our rights away on a whim. You never answered my "forced organ donation" question. Please answer that. If you woke up one day and decided I didn't need both kidneys - you would take one, wouldn't you?

[Airlightf]

A closer analysis of Abortion. Abortion is like going out side the country and killing all noncitizens because they don't have(protected rights) a voice in america/The US. By ending with the life of an unborn baby, you are not only presenting/bringing strange laws into the mind of the people, but also U are injuring the whole us--who we really are. Because we were in the womb once, but you guys seem to forget that.

[Airlightf]

@BlameRepublicans LOL, the Bill of Rights is barely new, life is Not. The Bill of Rights was born because of us--to "protect" us From those that are way to strong for us. Samething with the babies in the womb(Let them speak) Those [killers]outside are way to strong for them.-The unborn babies are us too.

[BlameRepublicans]

Following your logic - I am healthy and have two kidneys. If my neighbor needs one - the government should be able to force a medical procedure on me to save his life, right? If you are against this - why? What's the difference between your abortion stance and the forced organ donation?

[BlameRepublicans]

Here's the flaw in your plan -

We *can* save the life of the women without removing the Constitutional rights of anyone else.

We *can't* do this for the unborn. Ain't that a bitch?

[Airlightf]

@BlameRepublicans We don't want more unwanted babies to fill the world (our society), right? We also don't want more baby killers ( in our society). Let's just get rid of them.

[BlameRepublicans]

Interesting - care to explain your reasoning?

[Airlightf]

@BlameRepublicans Then it is necessary to kill the women/mothers then. That way you can justly justify abortion and there will be no more unwanted babies.

[BlameRepublicans]

@Airlightf I hear what you're saying. I agree it's unjust for the unborn to be aborted. Here's to problem - there's no JUST way in a free society to arbitrarily put the rights of the unborn in front of the impregnated. The average pro-choice person may argue that abortion does not take a life, but I don't. I acknowledge that abortions are losses of life, but this is necessary in a free society. Sorry.

[Airlightf]

@BlameRepublicans HAHAHAHAHAHAH. You are so funny. I cannot STOP thinking about a single word, JUSTICE. It can mean justice for women Justice for you Justice for everyone justice for evebody etc My rights, your rights, women's rights , babies rights--the right of the nation to be born--the right of the baby to be born.