Ray Comfort's intro Part 3

Ray Comfort's Intro Trilogy playlist
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=D8837E9489476207

my t-shirt store, please support :)
http://www.cafepress.com/evolutionxing

my twitter feed
http://twitter.com/qdragon

Category:

Education

Tags:

• ray
• comfort
• darwin
• origin
• of
• species
• way
• the
• master
• kirk
• cameron
• debunk
• evolution
• creation

[dustydirt]

frog + kiss = prince (fairytale)

frog + millions of years = prince (science)

now that's ridiculous.

you can't prove God does not exist, therefore you must believe.

evolution = religion.

you're gonna serve somebody. it might be the devil, it might be the Lord... but you're gonna have to serve somebody ~bob dylan

[qdragon1337]

god + dirt = human?

[1451tyler]

that damn ray COMORT!

[qdragon1337]

what typo.... :P

[ndvuncle]

Well, if I were in a plane that was due to crash. I'd tie Ray to the million dollars so he'd plummet even faster. Then I'd land safely with my parachute, grab the money and leave Ray for the wolves. They're God's creatures and need food too.

[philhellenes]

I'm trying to think of someone I respect LESS than Ray Comfort.

I mean I'm REALLY trying...

[dustydirt]

@gethsoftware

how can a blind man be free? Only Jesus Christ can set you free.

ONLY!!!

im down right fed up with the naturalist rhetoric.

why dont you open an old folks home services only swamp monkeys.

afterall, there just as sacred as humans... right?

[gethsoftware]

@dustydirt lot of them salamanders are called fire lizards. thats bechose they are cousins of those amfibians that evolved in to reptiles. allso, i dont have to serve anybody. if there are devils or gods, then i kill them. humanity is nobadys servant. we are free men.

[gethsoftware]

@dustydirt not really frog. you see the amfibians of that time where more like huge salamanders. those salamanders had adaptitions that alowed them avoid drying out, one of them was hardy scales witch protected their skin. other was that they culd lay eggs on land. hard shell on their eggs. then these reptiles evolved sails to catch suns reays to control their bodyheat, these where creatures like dimendrodon, they allso are called. mammal like reptiles bechose mammals evolved from them.

[avdmeers]

@songwriter4artists What evidence? The available evidence (literature history, cultures, biology, ...) disproves you. Your claim that atheists don't think is the most hilarious I've seen, it just shows how little you know of a group. It is someone like you who doesn't look at the evidence that speaks against your beliefs. The bible can be a generic instrument open for many interpretations, some pointing towards a really gracious god, and some to a dictator. What makes your interpretation law?

[songwriter4artists]

You can lead an atheist to evidence, but you can't make him think. The problem with atheists is that they don't want the evidence of God, they already reject him in their hearts, which means that even if the evidence is revealed they'd still reject it, because it didn't come how they wanted it to come. And another thing, he quoted a verse from the bible about God being jealous, and obviously, he just revealed his ignorance biblical terminology and contextual meaning. "Thou shalt not bow to idols

[thefusilier1000]

@dustydirt Wrong definition. "Scientific Theory" is what you need to quote. Start here.... /wiki/Scientific_theory

It is NOT an assumption. You are quoting the definition of "theory" that is used in common speech. Not the scientific usage.

[dustydirt]

@thefusilier1000

oxford english dictionary (11th edition)...

THEORY: a supposition (i.e. ASSUMPTION) or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained.

FACT: a thing that is indisputably the case.

FOOLISH: lacking good sense or judgement; silly or unwise.

EVOLUTION THEORY: foolish!

[thefusilier1000]

@dustydirt Theory is the highest level of understanding. Theories explain facts. You clearly don't understand the definition of a scientifc theory. It doesn't mean a hunch or a guess like it's used in casual converstation. If there was no evidence evoloution would be a hypothesis. So of course it will always be a theory.