Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

A Peek at some of my Strange Research into Bees - Zero Point Energy - Hieroglyphics and more

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,929
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 19, 2010

I heard the story of Viktor Grebbenikov and wanted to test some things out. I found a dead bee on my front porch and went to pick it up with some tweezers. Before I even touched it, the bee moved slightly. I raised my hand and the bee followed the tweezers just staying suspended as if hanging by a cobweb. But no cobweb. So I tested further.
The ass end is magnetic. This is weird.
The ass end and the body are detatched yet still attached by static electricity. (Non-Contact Attachment)

I unbent a paper clip and put it near the bee shell and I could move the shell around without touching it. Only dragging it though.

I separated the ass end from the body ever so slightly just to make sure they weren't attached and they snapped back together like 2 magnets.

I dangled this dead bee from what seems like static electricity.

There are some magnetic anomalies near bee hives. I don't think a bee hive registers on a gauss meter either.

A compass will deviate from North the closer to the hive you get.

Neodymium magnets seem to have no affect on the bees.

The slightest shift in magnetism = the slightest shift in gravity.
Gravity = time.

With enough bees placed in a specific fractal orientation, perhaps a vortex can be created where gravity / time is altered slightly or even drastically.

The bee in this video is NOT attached by a spider web, piece of string, or anything.
Chitin is what all insects are made out of.
Chitin is diamagnetic which means it repels magnetism.
Makes sense to me how they can fly then. The Earth's magnetic field pushes them off the ground when they generate some sort of charge from within it's abdomen and by the magneto-static created by the wing flapping.

But it doesn't make sense how a diamagnetic material can magnetically stick to a non magnetic paperclip.

Lots of researching to do...

Please try this yourselves. And look into Victor Grebbenikov.
I didn't kill the bee in my video. I found the body in my front yard. Respect nature and it will teach you things beyond comprehension.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (TheRealVerbz)

  • Hi Jason:

    I got a dead bumblebee and I tried to dangle it magnetically with a paper clip, like in your video. But I got nothing. I was wondering how you got yours to work. Do I have to remove the abdomen part of the bee from the body before it becomes more magnetic or staticky? Also, did you have to use some kind of static cling such as rubbing the dead bumblebee against staticky material before it stuck to your paperclip?

  • @telemachus18 When I went to pick up the bee I found on my doorstep with tweezers, the bee's body moved away from my tweezers. I went to grab it again and it moved again like the wind blew it or something. I retracted my hand and the body followed the tweezers and just remained dangling. I brought it inside and separated it with the paper clip and it was behaving strangely around the paper clips too. I have no clue what the determining factors are yet.

    I haven't been able to duplicate it since.

  • David Wilcock needs to see this...he is calling some of these bee structures pineal gland pine cones...

  • @karmacounselor Unfortunately, I think David's head has inflated so big that his eyes have swelled shut.

    Met him twice.

    He speaks A LOT of truth, but also has some major misconceptions.

    Dan Winter also speaks about the Pine Cones, but isn't arrogant.

    I love David Wilcock and would love to get the chance to sit down with him to talk In Depth about the work of Walter Russell, Leedskalnin, Grebbenikov, Dewey B Larson, Pier Ighina and people he may have heard of, but doesn't seem to have researched.

  • @TheRealVerbz your right but forgot p.d ouspensky one love

  • @kikkerthyzz Brilliant! Along with Immanuel Velikovsky, Dr. Pallathadka Keshava Bhat and so many others.

    Much respect.

    :o)

see all

All Comments (43)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hi,

    The locust was known back then too - there is at least one picture that looks like a locust in your video.

    Also, if you follow Edgar Casey - you will find he wrote saying there is a building under the sphyinx, it has a room ing the back (sealed), in this room is a book that tells of the origin of man. The Eygptian government won't let anyone open up the room.

  • I know this is an older vid but if you haven't read Graham Hancock's Fingerprints of the Gods you should. Incredible work about the origins of the original builders and common themes among the pyramidal structures around the world. I also recommend John Anthony West's work.

  • Much earlier (after seeing several of your vids, & before seeing this one) I thought you must have some interesting dreams sometimes. I wasn't going to ask you but after seeing this video I have to hear about some of your dreams, plz dream share...

    Perhaps some of us will meet in dreamREM sleep or share a common dream scene...

    Thank you for sharing and thank you for being here!

    LOVE & Peace

  • @TheRealVerbz Strange notions is needed to solve strange mysteries. Keep with the abnormal thinking to explain the abnormal. People who understand cant be understood lol.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more