The Field - Caroline
Top Comments
All Comments (24)
-
this sounds like Neu!
-
@bodyinparticular Actually creating new monikers makes things more difficult, just look at W. Voigt's discogs. Look-- I LOVE The Field. I was just musing about the way some underground music used to me released. And I still stand by my statements, PARTICULARLY for the Field, which represents such purity and minimalism. The funny thing about art is that Limits are liberating, because you make your own, and they spark creation. and what you write as mere "commonalities" was in fact a clear vision
-
@DvonKron I don't see where TheField is defined as a specific project other than the audience defining it as such based on commonalities across songs.To regard those commonalities as LIMITS and to hold them to it is pigeonholing.Creating a new moniker is just an easier way to categorize something different,something a secretary would be concerned with. There is no need for different monikers if there are no boundaries. Who wouldn't more respect something because it has no boundaries?
@DvonKron and @bodyinparticular
please get a room and let us enjoy the song
thanks
12pieter34 5 months ago 4
@DvonKron You are defining the Field based on your own interpretation, limiting another's work to fit your idea of purity/minimalism.Tools ex. a painter's brush/paints are limits,but being limited to those tools does not limit the creative process with those tools.It seems you are suggesting that the creative process should not deviate from one's canon(w/o a moniker change)-your use of the word LIMITS-which contradicts the idea of an artist making their own, allowing creativity as CAROLINE does
bodyinparticular 5 months ago