The Difference: Barack Obama & Ron Paul

An attempted non-bias voting record comparison between two candidates, Barack Obama and Ron Paul.

Please note "oppose" is defined as: 'To take a stand against: buck, challenge, contest, dispute, resist'.

Also this is essentially bias towards Obama. He was not in the Senate to vote against the Iraq War. Sorry, I thought he had. Also he was not there to vote on the first Patriot Act, but he did vote for the 2nd.

Ron Paul is also for keeping the internet free. Freedom is popular after all! ;)

----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
Barack Obama : The Illusion of Change
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=881_1203097397

Name One Accomplishment by Obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzFOOcEQtP0

Obama - Savior of Fainters
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7J80mVXvs64

Imagine how Obama's campaign would have gone if he had announced a year ago that he would keep Bush's Secretary of War.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/11/26/america/transition.php
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• political
• commercial
• grassroots
• outreach
• ron
• paul
• barack
• obama
• ad
• difference
• mtv
• democrats
• republicans
• biden
• election
• 08

[TexansToast]

I can't believe I bought obamas lies in the first place haha Go RON PAUL

[Solarfactor]

To make this non-biased, you could have used a more flattering picture of Obama. I agree with the message, though. Obama's a sell out.

[Eye2EyeIIIV]

Ron Paul vs Obama 2012!!!

[tr2006x]

@d3ltadrive More than Bush? I mean, did he spend more than Bush? About incompetence and idiocy - it's better to avoid any discussion :)))

MoRon Paul 2012!

[tr2006x]

@d3ltadrive you just agreed with me :)

MoRon Paul 2012!

[d3ltadrive]

@bajer111 Obama fucked things up. Obama thinks that we'll get out of debt by spending more then we're making, that is clear incompetence. Obama is an idiot.

[d3ltadrive]

@tr2006x In some parts of the country, yes, but that's because technology and medicine has improved much since then. By the way of course physics are much more advanced today science progresses over time idiot. Also our economic system matches the dictionary definition of national socialism so you can fuck off and take your uninformed rhetoric elsewhere.

[dodmoful]

@TexansToast dude your from Texas you never bought his lies.

[tr2006x]

@d3ltadrive In 1913 people used to die at 50, live a brutish life working 12 hours a day in fields starting from 5, no education, no medical care, no Internet, no iphone, etc, etc etc. You compare apples and oranges or rather apples and fish. 2-3% annual inflation is the last of my worries. BTW, back then physics was much simpler than it is today, because was much less of it :) National Socialism? Get serious! Having a sense of proportions is critical in understanding the world correctly.

[bajer111]

@d3ltadrive whats called national socialism? look I dont care how much you scream and shout like a neglectet 5 year old kid, facts are that the us is on its way down, and the only thing floating the boat right now is your military, which is still superior. maybe not for long, but still. I think obama is the man to save your country, you dont, and thats fine. youre clearly not a person to argue with.