The Anti Terrorist on Standing in Court Part #1

Creating Standing in Court

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• law
• legal
• theories
• defend
• standing
• judge
• court
• knowledge
• power
• control
• jurisdiction
• freedom
• free man
• regulations
• statutes
• codes
• corporation
• robe
• record
• affidavit
• de facto judgement
• de facto government
• ticket
• trial
• jury

[Harv7340]

paperwork, democratism, communism, common law, country, countries, affidavits, uniform commercial code, oaths, jurisdiction, constitution, bill of rights, blacks law dict, legality, inalienable/unalienable, freeman, human, civil, criminal, sovereign, acts, statutes, national,  international treaties, legislation, etc, r they not all hearsay, fictitious & ambiguous?, isn't it just a meeting of the minds?.type in imbatman57 in youtube & talkshoe.com.

[GrizzlyFist]

1984th viewer.

[ThisIsTheRealSkinny]

@Pulsationz It is a sideline law. I would love to hear what you think common law is and how it gets formed, because from what I can tell you don't even know what YOU think common law is. 

[ThisIsTheRealSkinny]

@Pulsationz It's my job? I've been correcting you guys for free, but if you're telling me I can get paid to do it, send me the link. I'll apply today.

Seriously though, common law is any law that isn't written by a legislative body, like congress. It's basically limited to laws that form in the court room through judge opinions. People bring a case into court, and there's no statutory law that deals with the issue, so the judge makes a decision, and his rule becomes common law.

[ThisIsTheRealSkinny]

@Pulsationz Sorry, but you don't appear to have a clear understanding of what common law means. You might want to research the topic further. Common law does not mean law that forbids injury, loss, or fraud. It means law that's created by the courts.

[ThisIsTheRealSkinny]

@Pulsationz You're telling me that if you entered a foreign society, you should be free to do as you please without being subject to their laws, unless you consent? Then what's to prevent you from going to any society and committing thievery and murder, and simply declaring you don't consent to their legal system once it's time to accept your punishment?

I'm sure it sounded great to you in theory, but in practice it's less than desirable.

[ThisIsTheRealSkinny]

@Pulsationz C'mon... I'm completely open to an alternative suggestion, but you don't even have one. If you think I'm wrong you could at least give me some kind of support for a different position.

[ThisIsTheRealSkinny]

@Pulsationz The case law is well established. Tagging, residency, or minimum contacts are the most common ways a court will establish personal jurisdiction. Any search you perform on Personal Jurisdiction will tell you the same. Consent wouldn't even be an issue in most traffic cases because 99% of the people who receive a ticket will either 1. receive the ticket while in the state, or 2. be a resident of the state. If either of those is true, PJ is already established, even without consent.

[ThisIsTheRealSkinny]

Jurisdiction isn't obtained by consent. It can be, but typically it's obtained by residency in a state, presence in a state, or by having contact with a state. If you refuse to answer to your name, all you're going to do is confuse the judge. I swear, 90% of these videos must be jokes to try and get people to do the craziest stuff they can think of in a court room.

[StrawmanSolution]

The English and the American court systems are different with different terminology. Where can I find the necessary distinctions for the American court system please, and from the beginning as I don't know what to do to appear under special visitation?