Coast to Coast AM - 8 of 11 - 9/11 Debate (Aug. 21, 2010)

Info: http://world911truth.org - Richard Gage, from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and Dave Thomas, a physicist from New Mexicans for Science and Reason, joined Ian Punnett for the entire program to debate the idea of controlled demolition of buildings on 9/11

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Richard Gage
• Dave Thomas
• 9/11
• 911
• AE911Truth
• Nanothermite
• controlled demolition

[centrino105]

Dave and Kim you clowns will have to answer for what you are attempting to do here in front of a grand jury because it is a crime to attempt to cover-up the truth of mass murder you know? I suggest you get your lies in order a-holes because this recording will be used against you.

[JohnNiemsMusic]

Once again folks here we go with misleading information as it really should not be a debate as the building 7 came down because of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION! RICHARD GAGE and NIELS HARRIT tell the truth and the other two are GATE KEEPERS or just plain idiots!

[centrino105]

@dsemencar

So you are happy that murdering pigs and liars have gotten away with their crimes so far? Wow that says a lot about you doesn't it.

Have patience, even Hitler escaped justice for a while until he had to kill himself that is. Mussolini got away with it for a while too until eventually he was hung from a lamp post by his own people.

You just keep on cheering on these lying scum buddy and who knows maybe you will have to answer for it in front of a jury of your peers someday.

[152czar]

@cheerdiver if it were less enriched, it wouldn't be able to create a nuke.

Jones definitely tested for radiation, and there was none.

[cheerdiver]

@152czar centrifuges produce a much less enriched product, and it cost alot more. I would propagate some sensitive info, but this is a public forum. The 1st devices were made w/ slide rules, yet somehow u deny any advancement w/ computers. Geiger counters "compare" background radiation. They have know how to reduce fallout dramatically, it was just too expensive even for the MIC. Besides, war is about perceived threat, ie fear.

[152czar]

@cheerdiver No he used a geiger counter as well; a nuke would have produced fallout.

laser enrichment is the same as others; the end product is the same the methods are different.

[cheerdiver]

@152czar lol completely false, Jones tested for TRITIUM. If u read his report to disprove, the use of fission and fusion are reversed. Not credible to those who know the difference.

He also "claimed" not to know where the very high content of aluminasilicate came from. Zeolite was used at Chernobyl and Fukushima and it's ALUMINASILICATE!!

Bedrock granite: 72% Si2O2 & 15% Al2O3 Do u have to guess what happens when fission temps are applied?

LASER enrichment greatly reduces radiation of blast!

[dsemencar]

@centrino105 1 year since your post...waiting for that grand jury still? How about the last 7 years of Bush...and no one in congress brought charges against him or Cheney, etc...

[152czar]

@cheerdiver Jones tested for radiation. No signs of radiation. therefore no nuclear blast

[cheerdiver]

@152czar How do u explain the blast circles? loc(dot)gov/exhibits/911/image­s/lg-map-therm1(dot)jpg

or the "earthquakes" that happened moments before collapse.

Do steel beams just melt by themselves, thermal energy just come from no where.

[152czar]

@cheerdiver lol completely false