The Argument: miracles (as defined) are possible events, which are identifiable and distinguishable from natural events, whose validity can be investigated by reason and historical inquiry. In other words, the contention I am defending in this series is that miracles are possible and that they are researchable via history and logic.
A Miracle is: "...a specific event that would not have happened if only the natural order had been operating, where the natural order is understood to involve physical entities, their interactions, and the actions and interactions of animals, humans, and beings with powers much like ours," (p. 596, Tim and Lydia McGrew, 2009), following the definition offered by Timothy and Lydia McGrew
Sources:
Audi, Robert. (1999). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
Craig, W.L., & Moreland, J.P. (2003). Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press
Craig, W.L. (2008). Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics (3rd Ed.). Wheaton, Ill: Crossway Books
Craig, W.L., & Moreland, J.P. (2009). The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Dembski, W. A. (1998). The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press
Geivett, R.D., & Habermas, G.R. (1997). In Defense of Miracles: A Comprehensive Case for God's Action in History. Downer's Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press
Habermas, G.R., & Moreland, J.P. (1998). Beyond Death: Exploring the Evidence for Immortality. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers
Habermas, G.R., & Licona, M.R. (2004). The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications
Hume, D. (1777). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.
Lewis, C.S. (1947). Miracles. New York, NY: HarperCollins
Licona, M. (2010). The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach. Nottingham, ENG: InterVarsity Press
Moreland, J.P. (1987). Scaling the Secular City. Grand Rapids: MI, Baker Book House
Spinoza, B. (1670). Tractatus Theologicopoliticus
I always thought that miracles were neither provable nor usable in proving christianity since it happens outside of the the boundaries of natural law. if a miracle happened to an atheist or in such a way that it effected future events then it might be usable but miracles are God's intervention in the natural world. if they were permissible within natural law, then they would cease to be miracles.
RealKeenan 1 year ago
@RealKeenan If you look at the definition I provided on miracles it helps: an event that would not have occurred if only the natural order were operating. Within this definition you have the marrying of a supernatural cause inexplicable from natural law, with the natural laws subsuming the inception of the event and carrying it along. In other words, you have an event inexplicable (water turning into wine) that are then subsumed by laws (the wine is digestible, oxidizes etc).
telemantros 1 year ago
Interesting that Craig would invoke quantum indeterminacy in a context where it suits his theology...
DasAmericanAtheist 1 year ago
@DasAmericanAtheist Ya, he kinda 'points' towards it as an option, but doesn't commit to it. I have to be honest, the potential is important but too many people try to explain everything by quantum mechanics ... : /
telemantros 1 year ago
water into Vodka now that would be a real miracle
000whiterabbit 1 year ago
@000whiterabbit Water into wine man, water into wine
telemantros 1 year ago