01 What's the point?

http://www.lulu.com/content/7436620

http://www.amazon.com/Why-God-Doesnt-Exist-ebook/dp/B002IPHCME

http://www.youstupidrelativist.com/WGDE.html

http://www.youstupidrelativist.com/01Math/01Point/00SumPoint.html


The word POINT is the most fundamental building block of Geometry. Relativists and mechanics routinely rely on it to explain theories such as Big Bang, annihilation. Yet the mathematicians tell you that the word POINT should remain undefined for else their arguments would end up being circular.

Here we expose this sales pitch for what it is: a preposterous lie. We show that the mathematicians of the world have devised this doctrine because they cannot use the word POINT consistently (i.e., scientifically). If the mathematicians define a POINT as a location, they cannot use it as a brick to construct geometric figures, and if relativists define the POINT as a 'dynamic' event, they cannot also use it as the 'static' center of a black hole. It is the versatility of the word POINT which enables the establishment to 'explain' everything and anything.

Physics deals first and foremost with objects. Philosophy deals with concepts. If the POINT is not a figure (i.e., a dot), the mathematical physicists are not doing Physics or Geometry. They are in the best of cases doing Philosophy. However, the routine practice of replacing the concept 'location' with the object 'dot' places the mathematical POINT squarely within religion. Mathematical Physics is the 'science' of reification. The mathematical POINT has no place in Science.



http://www.youstupidrelativist.com

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Einstein
• Stephen
• Hawking
• Newton
• rope hypothesis
• thread theory
• point
• line
• plane
• solid
• Euclid
• Hilbert
• Weyl
• Geometry
• string theory

[MrAlexGTV]

The point is what you'd call a "movie" I believe. But, Gaede you tergiversate when you call a dot 2D. It's 3D. You can say "I treat it as 2D" but the real point/dot is physical, i.e. 3D. A plane is only real if we observe it and from some angles it disappears. Physically speaking a dot is 3D as anything we know.

[bgaede]

"The point is...3D"

.

The ink blot or chalk mark is 3D. A square or circle is 2D. The mathematicians have to tell the crowd whether their 'point' is the 3D raised mark or the 2D representation of the point. We can say that the mathematical point is AS A MINIMUM 2D. It certainly is not 0D as claimed.

[bgaede]

3. "Watching your videos is a chore, a bore, and not very fun"

.

You should then find something to do that is commensurate with your intellectual level, iNept. Try sticking your head in the toilet and watching the shit float by on the surface. That ought to be fun for a moron like you...

[bgaede]

2. "MAKE YOUR FUCKING POINT"

I did, you idiot! The fact that YOU didn't get the point reflects on YOU. So many people have come here, most of them from the establishment, and everyone understood the point because they immediately complained against my arguments.

.

Again, your shortcomings are something you will have to take up with yo momma, bean brain.

[bgaede]

1. "Fake voices are annoying"

No sense of humor!

.

"give your presentation in an organized manner"

I did , you fucking idiot! It eliminates one by one the dot, the location, the crossed lines, the ordered pair... versions of point of your religion.

.

"Constant scowling and looking cartoonish is not pleasant to the eye"

Perhaps you should close your eyes!

[bgaede]

"some things can be treated as points if they are small enough"

.

And your brain is a case in point!

.

This is a point, you stupid idiotic moron> .

.

It's a 2D geometric FIGURE. Any questions?

.

[Xero555000]

@bgaede why?

[Xero555000]

@bgaede ... no, some things can be treated as points if they are small enough relative to your scale, if it's as big as an elephant then you need to represent the surface and interior of the elephant with points... you dont know anything about physics, so why are you criticizing it?