Carl Sagan's Cosmos Episode 3 part5

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
14,458
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 9, 2008

continued from part 4

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (SirNewt)

  • People need to have their families supporting them if they go into science. If only people were not so competitive so much more would be done with several minds working together, even a friction between them could make each other more intelligent. Some competition is good but only if it strengthens each other. Imagine if at least a large fraction of the human population became thorough scientists. Many people don't understand the importance of a few degreese of observation but it matters.

  • @RJL738 Well, I think that is what we are moving toward. Many more people now are scientists than ever before. It's an interesting cyclic relationship. Science facilitates technology which in turn provides more highly and diversely educated people, who in turn produces increasing amounts of science.

Top Comments

  • Tycho is such a hero... Maybe not as smart as Galileo or Kepler, but anyone who gets his nose cut off in a fight is OK with me

  • Nah, Brahe was the pimp.

see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Brahe was like Charlie from Two and a Half Men and then Kepler was like his uptight brother Alan who has to move in with Charlie.

  • it wsa esay to be a matamatichian coz everybodys was so stewpid bachh than

  • Brahe was the 'pimp;' Kepler was something of a fussbudget. Still, we stand on the shoulders of giants; without the Greeks, Copernicus, Brahe, and Kepler (one upon the other; each in their turn), we would be tent dwellin goat herders. Fact, my brothers and sisters.

  • @fc007

    Kepler was the first to try and make a model of a part of the cosmos, and to actually verify if such model was accurate. He wasn't afraid to change his model (circular -> ellipse). Copernicus did not have accurate measurements of the planets' orbits, he guessed they were circular. Erostosthenes did calculate the Earth's radius so you have a point there. Galileo was contemporary with Kepler :)

  • @gininginin If you direguard Copernicus, Galileo, Erostosthenes, and all before him perhaps your statement would be accurate.

  • Kepler was probably the first true scientist

  • Poor Kepler

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more