Biotech & Transhumanism Discussed by Tom & Nita Horn - Pt 1

Tom & Nita Horn on The Harvest Show discussing Biotechnology and the possibility that new sciences are the fullfillment of prophecy that will lead to the return of Nephilim

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• nephilim
• transhumanism
• posthumans
• animal-human
• chimeras
• bible
• prophecy

[RaptureAlert]

Thanks, Tom and Nita for your work and Raider's News Update.

[missionettess]

Thank you for your kind words!

[gabrielcrimson]

idiots

[secHumanist]

dude, what r u on? thts some strong shit...

[sjdss]

hot black chick!

[SailorBarsoom]

Wow, both definitions use the word "reason." I guess you got me.

@_@

Look, a Druid may worship trees, but that doesn't make forestry a religion.

A Secular Humanist may believe that science offers our best chance at understanding the world, but that doesn't make science itself a religion.

A Christian may use bread and wine for Communion services, but that doesn't make Mrs. Baird or Gallo saints.

Maybe you should stop making these mighty leaps.

OMG, both definitions use the word "reason"!!!

[TornadoWeaver]

from Wordnet on Secular Humanism - the doctrine emphasizing a person's capacity for self-realization through reason; REJECTS religion and the supernatural (emphasis added).

from Wikipedia on Science - a continuing effort to discover and increase human knowledge and understanding through disciplined research (taken from the root-word DISCIPLE, my comment)

hmm, reason and disciplined research, hmm.

SailorBarsoom, look words up before arguing nonsense. And pass that along to SCOTUS, also.

[n07w4tU7hnk]

glad God isnt about magic .. in fact, he warns against it

ZARDEX (what does that name imply, btw?) - better to get your facts straight on the Bible before retorting & trying to be "cool" on your posts ... false statements equate to magical chants, dont you know? ^-^

[SailorBarsoom]

He didn't say "" he said science. That SCOTUS doesn't think that science and Secular Humanism are the same thing is evidenced by the fact that science can be taught in public schools (because science is not a religion) while Secular Humanism can not (because it is a religion).

That's leaving aside the whole question of why it's OK for the SCOTUS to create a religion.

[SailorBarsoom]

That's Secular Humanism, not science.

And isn't it funny that the SCOTUS did what Congress can not do: they established a religion, they named it, and they made laws about it.

[TornadoWeaver]

Xeletoph wrote... whoa whoa whoa! Hold on a second here. Science... A religion? NO! Science IS NOT a Faith! There's no scientific hierarchy that all scientists obey, there are no omnipotent avatars of science, there are no religious holidays for science, there is no dogma. rant, rant, etc...

au contrere, it has been said 'Secular Humanism is a religion.' -U.S.Supreme Court.

[TornadoWeaver]

au contrere, is has been said 'Secular Humanism is a religion.' - U.S. Supreme Court.

[r0an24]

so they'll blend animal and human genes will create a chimera... which is a natural disaster.. whut? it's cool but... they should not play gods.