JP
Upload

MOLTEN CONCRETE & METAL - EVIDENCE & TESTIMONY 9/11 THERMITE DENIERS HATE; WTC "METEORITE"

ricthuse ricthuse·2,234 videos
2,832
2,974
Like     Dislike 1

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like ricthuse's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike ricthuse's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add ricthuse's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Mar 15, 2010

Video is dedicated to the victims, first responders, victims families, and the tireless "truthers" who are sacrificing their time, treasure and talents to bring truth to light and justice to criminals. If we don't seek truth and justice...how can we expect freedom and liberty?

Video is also dedicated to Leonard Kleinrock and Tim Berners-Lee, inventors of the internet and WWW respectively. Their inventions have become a tool to expose tyrants...through these inventions we shall overcome tyranny.

WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibits all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives: (and some non-standard characteristics)

1. Rapid onset of collapse

2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a full second prior to collapse

3. Symmetrical collapse through the path of greatest resistance at free-fall acceleration

4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed mostly in its own footprint

5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds

6. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses

7. Chemical signature of Thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples by physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.

8. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples

9. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional

10. Fore-knowledge of collapse by media, NYPD, FDNY

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.

1. Slow onset with large visible deformations

2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)

3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel

4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never collapsed.

AE911truth.org
--------------------------------

The Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives: (and some non-standard characteristics)

1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration

2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution

3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction

4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes

5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 600 ft at 60 mph

6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking

7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds

8. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no "pancaked" floors found

9. Isolated explosive ejections 20 40 stories below demolition front

10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame

11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises

12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples

13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples

14. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.

1. Slow onset with large visible deformations

2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)

3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel

4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never collapsed

AE911truth.org

Portions from Blueprint For Truth, 30 minute edit version.

911 South Tower molten metal stabilization by JKeogh.

Spontaneous Combustion from trapped heat WTC 7, 9-21-01 - Kurt Sonnenfeld.

INFOWARS.COM
PRISONPLANET.COM
PRISONPLANET.TV
OATHKEEPERS.ORG
AE911TRUTH.ORG

Music:

Volitile Planet - Odyssey Into The Mind's Eye - Kerry Livgren

Can I Tell You - 1st Album - Kansas

John Brown Mural - Kansas State House

  • Category

  • License

    Standard YouTube License

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Uploader Comments (ricthuse)

  • nivarion

    There was a lot of wood, paper, plastic and fabric inside the building.

    Humans have been melting iron with wood since before the fall of Rome. I don't know why you insist that it had to be thermite or jet fuel.

    Go research how we used to smelt and forge iron. It will tell you a lot more about how this can be done.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate nivarion's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate nivarion's comment.
  • ricthuse
    I never claimed jet fuel could melt metal. The hotest possible hydrocarbon fire in normal atmosphere is your gas range. This does not melt the grate or pan. I researched it years ago. To melt metal you need: 1) continual fuel 2) forced air 3) an insulated box 4) time None of these conditions were present on 9/11. see: watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw Both unreacted and reacted nanothermite residue was in the WTC dust. Molten iron is a product of thermite reaction.
    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ricthuse's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ricthuse's comment.
    in reply to nivarion (Show the comment)
  • nivarion

    A blast furnace has large amounts of fuel with no oxygen present being heated by fuel that has it. When you expose the the fuel to oxygen, it ignites and melts the iron very quickly.

    on 9/11 we had; Fuel and steel entrapped in concrete, fuel that was trapped in concrete but receiving oxygen, and about 8 weeks of time. Every time they exposed fuel at flash point they noticed smoke, and then found molten or near molten steel. There is little wonder it resembled a foundry, it nearly was

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate nivarion's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate nivarion's comment.
    in reply to ricthuse (Show the comment)
  • ricthuse

    A blast furnace has forced air, (which includes oxygen). The fuels used in a blast furnace do not supply their own oxygen. The debris was in a pile AND under a virtual lake of water created by the firefighters. The thermite was burning at a temperature hundreds of degrees higher than any jet fuel or office furnishings can possibly create, as documented by NASA overhead infrared imagery of the debris piles.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ricthuse's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ricthuse's comment.
    in reply to nivarion (Show the comment)
  • nivarion

    However, the thermite and thermate, and nano thermite reactions have obvious hindrances to their being the cause of the WTC collapse.

    First, they act as a liquid when reacting. Since they are hot enough to melt steel and shatter concrete, its very difficult to make them cut a vertical beam.

    Also, we have to deal with the weight. For a thermite reaction to last weeks, you'd need on order of thousands of tons of it.

    Nano thermite is still in its experimental stages.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate nivarion's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate nivarion's comment.
    in reply to ricthuse (Show the comment)
  • ricthuse

    Copper cutting guides exist which are used with thermite, which self-consume in the process of cutting. The resulting heat of the burning/smoldering thermite remained for weeks. NASA overhead infrared imagery documented the heat. Nanothermite was present in both reacted and UNREACTED condition in the WTC debris. We have electron microscope images of the nanothemite that was in the WTC dust.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ricthuse's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ricthuse's comment.
    in reply to nivarion (Show the comment)
  • ricthuse

    NOT "thousands of tons."

    Based on the mass of the iron-rich spheres (reacted themite residue) found in a sample of the dust found in a nearby apartment, Steven Jones estimated that about .04 percent of the dust was "iron-rich spherule," which would be "of the order of ten tons." This gives us some idea of how much Thermite was in the twin towers.

    NIST never tested the dust for ANY explosives residue. This violates fire investigation standards, and is a criminal cover-up.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ricthuse's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ricthuse's comment.
    in reply to nivarion (Show the comment)

Video Responses


All Comments (16)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • The911watch

    Pease watch and share this trailer of the WTC 7 scandal:

    watch?v=uh7RCVJ8ako

    Your freedom and democracy depends on it

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate The911watch's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate The911watch's comment.
  • Lobster oftheisland

    People who say the number of conspirators would be too great, remind them of the Philadelphia/Montauk(rainbow) experiment. Or the Clinton legacy! Money and power talks, or in this case, does not talk!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Lobster oftheisland's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Lobster oftheisland's comment.
  • megamogx
    /watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o /watch?v=5qFsjdymqSk /watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k /watch?v=zhnNy5EsebA /watch?v=iGqjzFQvfdI /watch?v=WxqoChniKVU /watch?v=9QWvkAgyIY4 /watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY /watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE /watch?v=HSjDCwN2i3w /watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ /watch?v=wKuLUu7SQU4
    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate megamogx's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate megamogx's comment.
  • TheCrazyFinn

    Nero burned down Rome, to blame the Christians. It seems someone burned down WTC to blame the Muslims...

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate TheCrazyFinn's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate TheCrazyFinn's comment.
  • Headshothorror4488

    See now NIST should be laughed at , They lied and left evidence out. Sounds like a moron

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Headshothorror4488's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Headshothorror4488's comment.
  • The4LA2Baker0

    Thats a controlled burn. Huge difference. When you use wood to make a furnace you are carefully controlling the oxygen and fuel supply. The towers were an UNCONTROLLED burn. Not to mention the buildings strict safety standards. No highly combustible or explosive materials were allowed. The fire shutters worked and cut off the vast majority of oxygen to the fires. The thick black smoke is a clear sign of an oxygen starved, low heat fire. You need to do research before you preach BS.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate The4LA2Baker0's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate The4LA2Baker0's comment.
    in reply to nivarion (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later