Hilary Putnam on the Philosophy of Science: Section 3

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
28,357
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 15, 2008

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • working scientists who ignore professional philosophers of science end up mouthing discarded ideas.

  • I like this Hilary character, something in his smiles.

see all

All Comments (60)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Putman seems like a pretty nice guy

  • Counter-point is the science of making music at all algo-rythmic realities,identified and rendered by the composer in all delivery instances.

    NINI NO BLESS aka DENIS LE PAGE .

  • Thank you for a most interesting and stimulating discussion. Applause!

  • @sefjaguar I do believe that UK universities ought to follow a model similar to Oxford, or even Harvard, both institutions are, as you probably know, renowned for their brilliant sociological work.

    On a side note, could you direct me to where Lyotard said he made up the evidence for his Postmodern Condition. I always found his work to be dubious...to put it nicely....

  • @sefjaguar I tend agree with your statement about the looseness off it. To speculate I'd say that it ultimately stems from the lack of 'agreed' method within the discipline (at least in the UK). As a result you tend to find many departments full of academics with highly disparate interests and many, trained in a discipline that isn't even Sociology. On top of that, I think the so-called 'cultural-turn' has 'sliced' up the discipline in a way that is not too dissimilar to Anthropology.

  • having read his papers several time... I find his appearance didn't come close to how I imagined him to look

  • This really is an excellent programme. Thank you very much for uploading it.

  • @sefjaguar I refer to those who just create radical arguments by cherry picking 'evidence'. Even someone like JF Lyotard who features quite prominently in any UK sociology degree openly admitted to 'making up' the statistics and evidence for his work 'The Postmodern Condition'. If one of the leading French intellectuals of the 1990's admits to doing this then the subject in general is simply failing to comply to academic standards of the more accepted subjects.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more