The Romanovs: An Imperial Family Part 4
Top Comments
All Comments (29)
-
While some here may not have a full understanding of politics or war, as id think NONE of you actually lived that time, really it's simple to see Nicholas did the things he did for his family. IF he had focused only on being Tsar and war and politics, some would say he felt nothing for his personal life. See, can't have it both ways, folks. That's how society is fucked up. In the end, he probably wasn't the best candidate for Tsar, but he was a perfect family man.
-
is that rasputin in part 7:47? the one wearing the cross?
-
You can all say that Nicholas was a bad man, or a greedy man, or a weak and ignorant ruler. But as far as im concerned, he could have been the most horrible man on earth, but his family did not deserve to suffer. Did his children do anything at all to deserve what they got? No. No they did not. Did his wife? She didn't deserve the suffering either. And as for Nicholas, wether he was weak or bad or greedy, I dont believe he deserved to die. So, I say R.I.P The Romanovs
-
Neithie I never said the children deserved to be murdered. Read my comment again. I said. He brought destruction upon himself and his family.
-
@TheGreg131313 You really think the children deserved to be murdered? Their mother? They were very happy to just leave and live in England... not stop it at all... the entire treatment of the innocent, and they WERE innocent, shows just how much value honor really had.
-
That Mottherfuckers networth was 30 billion dollars! His people were starving and being killed. He could of change his country with one billion dollars,but he didn't. Greedy asshole. He brought it upon himself and his family. I think by the way the story shows,at the end he looks like he was really sorry for what he had done. He was human and power and that insane amount of money can make a person greedy . 30 billion!!
-
Guy below me. Do you know anything about history. Nicholas was weak, unpopular. He was known as bloody Nicholas.... 1905 Russia lost against Japan. Lost first world war.
-
@olekmaggie Nicolas was a good man, if not a good Tsar.
-
Nicolas was NOT a good tsar. He was a weak ruler who involved Russia into IWW(absolutelly unnecessary one) when the economy of the country was not prepared at all. And when it was was the top-moment for him to show his power and might, when the motherland needed a strong hand, which could defend Russia from freaking communists.This movie shows all the situation perfectly. He was a victim of own weakness. But of course, I do NOT think, that the execution of the entire family was a correct thing.
Nicholas was a weak ruler who wasn't very good, but, he was a good man who loved his family.
Splee331 7 months ago 17
@freelancelady It is my understanding that the Romanov family line (just like all Monarchs) were both positive and negative?They had good Kings and Queens and bad ones too-so it sort of depends on which camp you want to side with as to about being "sinister" From our perspective of hindsight though, I'd say he was way better than Stalin who followed years and years later. i really think Tsar Nicolas loved his people-he was just out of touch with them-he did love God and his family tho-it is sad
TheStaticage01 1 year ago 9