Stephen Barasch - Arkitekt - Svenska undertexter

AE911Truths Exklusiva Intervju!
Stephen Barasch, Arkitekt.
Detta är en oredigerad intervju med en av de experter i världsklass som medverkar i Architects and Engineers' kommande, tunga dokumentär "11 September: Explosiva Bevis - Experter Talar Ut"

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Stephen Barasch
• Arkitekt
• Swedish
• svensk
• översättning
• svenska
• undertexter
• svensktextad
• nanotermit
• termat
• nanoteknologi
• rivning
• 11:e
• september
• 9/11
• arkitekter
• ingenjörer
• damm
• Experter
• Talar
• Ut
• New
• York
• terroristattacker
• World
• Trade
• Center
• WTC
• WTC7
• FEMA
• NIST
• Richard
• Gage
• AE911Truth
• sprängämne
• kontrollerad
• brott
• kriminalteknik
• ritning
• höghus
• tändämnen
• Tvillingtornen
• sanning
• fritt
• fall-acceleration

[sankhyasutra]

@badstacksize AGREE AGREE AGREE - the 19 so called high 'jaquers' are not nearly interesting as thte 19 top brass that stood down

[armindee]

@InnerSmile72 and the dog is you..?

[badstacksize]

@InnerSmile72 yeah those who actually still believe the "official" story really should have their head examined.. I mean, a bunch of cavemen made NORAD stand down!?.. That means "bin Laden" actually had more power than the top generals in the US army

[kemirockarfett]

9 11 is a sympthom of US privat central bank and the corruption around that. Even a kid could see that the buildings are blowed up, its visible in several videos together witn burning thermite flowing out from one of the skyscrapers. So Fuck you mr banksters and military industrial complex and puppit government in USA to be behind this nazi stand down false flag.

[InnerSmile72]

I look back now and I’m actually a little embarrassed that Truthers used to get under my skin so much. Now I really just feel badly for them; the whole phenomenon is really sad. One of my friends has a really sweet dog that was a completely normal, healthy puppy until this past summer, at which point it suddenly started getting obsessed with its shadow – it sits there studying it and then every ten seconds or so it’ll jump on it with both paws.

[InnerSmile72]

@andrewlowewatson Then it backs up, waits another ten seconds, and tries again. This goes on for hours and hours. The dog is only a couple of years old, and this brain-freeze situation is only getting worse. Every time I see her, it makes me want to cry. That’s kind of how I feel about Truthers now. I used to get upset whenever they sent me those 14,000-word letters, but now I just wish someone would give them a hug or something.

[PapaOystein]

Going over 3 years - when will AE911T's "petition" be wrapped up and presented to Comgress? 10:02 "Perhaps it's time before too many years pass..." Yep there's one thing Barasch gets right. Why does it take R. Gage so long to go to Congress? Criminal neglect? Or is he earning too much from AE911T (70,000 US$ in 2009) and doesn't want to abandon his main source of personal income too soon?

[PapaOystein]

9:08 "Pruitt-Igoe was a classic case ... was demolished" Barasch should take a close look at the demolition of Pruitt-Igoe or indeed any controlled demolition of a highrise. Watch v=cd7VOz_Wstg - and notice the very loud BANGs that always come before the onset of collapse! None of that seen or heard on 9/11. Besides, P-I was a concrete structure, not readily comparable to steel-frame.

[PapaOystein]

5:55 "I am told it fell in 7 seconds, approximately, from top to bottom" - Pal, they told you a lie, and you fell for it. Collapse durtion was closer to 16 seconds.

6:38 "it was build, apparently, to a fairly modern code which required stiif columns..." Apparently, Barasch doesn't even know NISTs theory, which exposed a gap in the existing codes, which had nothing at all to do with stiffness.

6:55 "This is a mystery to me" - no wonder if you only know AE911T's lies instead of the facts.

[PapaOystein]

He is an expert for building houses. I presume none of his highrises has collapsed so far, so he is not an expert on the collapse of buildins. Any statement he makes concerning the look of the collapses is only an argument from incedulity. He makes a few statements and suggestions along the way that are false or misleading:

- collapses were not symetrcal

- were not without resistance

- the heat of jet fuel fires is not important here

- the heat has little bearing on what collaps looks like

etc