Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

The Megahertz Myth

From a keynote a few years back. The VP of Apple Hardware explains what the megahertz myth is in a nutshell, as well as promote the hell out of the PowerPC G4 and diss the Pentium 4.  
 
Customize

More From: GetAMacForDave

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
113 ratings
Sign in to rate
32,406 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (211)   Options

Loading...
ikilluish (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
At 2.4 GHz it took my old Dell Dimension 4600 w/2.4 GHz Pentium 4 over 5 minutes to download and processor 1 SONG! And some people think the Pentium 4 is the best processor out there. The only good Pentium 4s were the Northwood-based ones. Besides, it never reached 10 GHz, only 3.8 GHz. The Athlon XP usually outperformed it. Athlon 64 X2 outperformed the shitty Pentium D. My Pentium Dual-Core laptop can outperform some desktop Pentium Ds. In sort: the NetBurst microarchitecture sucked.
kinamod2k (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
notice the neva showed the clock speed at twice tho. if they showed the p4 running twice as fast (approx) it wouldnt have fallen so far behind.
ikilluish (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Forget it...
ikilluish (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
They use Intel processors for three main reasons:

1. During the intro of the Power Mac G5, Steve Jobs promised that the PowerPC G5 would reach 3 GHz within 1 year. But two years later, the PowerPC G5 still didn't reach that clock speed.

2. IBM could not keep the heat intensity and power consumption of the PowerPC G5 low enough for them to be used the iBooks or PowerBooks.

3. The Intel processors would offer 70 units of performance per watt while the IBM PowerPC only offered 15.
4K4K1K0 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
»And it would take years for Apple to recompile all their code to AMD.«

Ummm, no.
ikilluish (1 month ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
Pentium 4 sucks!!! It always did!!! the Pentium III was better than that piece of shit
4K4K1K0 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
NETBURST FTW! ATHLON BOOO! Dell and many retail didn't sell any computers with Athlon a reason: they sucked, sure they were a lot cooler and sustain a higher temperature, also their multiplicator could be changed after application with pencil, but who cares? REAL GHZ count! With the P4 technology up to 10 GHZ!!! The longer the pipelines the better! And after P4 there is an even brighter future awaiting us: the revolutionary Itanium technology!!!1
ikilluish (2 weeks ago)
Comment removed by author
4K4K1K0 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Are you serious? Because I wasn't... >_>
BarricadeSlade (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Flash is AWFUL on the PowerPC Macs.
It's like Adobe coded it with blindfolds for a bet while they were at the bar, drunk.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.