NDAA and the Constitution - Part 3: War and Repeal

This video series takes a critical look at the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) recently signed into law. This law is just the most recent example of our government using the justification of fear and the war on terror to remove the constraints on government power which are intrinsic to our Constitution. If you examine the ramifications of the changes, it becomes clear that the wisdom of the protections of civil liberties included in our constitution can and should be applied to the modern age.

Part 1: Romney & Gingrich - http://youtu.be/QzNNsLB5Ra8
Part 2: Shut up! You don't get a lawyer!!! - http://youtu.be/jIawimcXGmU
Part 3: War and repeal - http://youtu.be/PKBshvnXay0

Find out if your representative voted for the NDAA here:
Senate - http://www.opencongress.org/vote/2011...
House of Representatives - http://www.opencongress.org/vote/2011...

Learn more about the legal precedents that gradually stripped away our rights leading ot the current NDAA here:
http://www.corbettreport.com/the-ndaa...

Learn more about the Enemy Expatriation Act here: http://www.fox19.com/story/16666641/r...

• Category

  News & Politics

[linj2fly]

watched all three...very clear argument.



[brianfmiddleton]

Superb! Keep up the great work!!!

[gitel13]

no difference between either party.

[C Warren]

Our forefathers are "rolling in their graves".

Lets make 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Dr.Paul's new address!

[3Gallagher]

Excellent presentation. You do the Principles of America proud. Thank you. To Liberty once again..

[Kelso Anderson]

6:35 is right.

[ClarenceOlsen1]

It may soon be considered a threat to the government if a person supports the Constitution of the USA.

[hellfrost333]

Ron Paul or New world order

Support the Constitution or Shred the Constitution

[fuvkyougoogification]

the forefathers would be shooting by now...

[daveme7]

Some Union soldiers were tried for what people thought they were trying to do to steal union arms and free confederate soldiers. The war ended before their date with the hangman and so they were able to legally fight it where it went to the Supreme Court-they ruled you can only take the kinds of actions only if the court system was inoperable. If the courts worked-you cannot do this and those soldiers were set free.

[daveme7]

m one of those people who are more concern ed with freedom as opposed to credit(please understand I wrote this before viewing the video.) First-what the hell is the dept of Homeland Security for. No matter what one thinks of DHS-it was started for the mission of what they7 say we need the military policing us with the ideal of America as a battle field. I n the Civil war something similar happened where these soldiers were tried for insurrection where they thought they would steal Union arms...