Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Writing with Hitchcock: Plot vs. Story in Alfred Hitchcock's Vertigo

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,473
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 17, 2010

Discussion of the difference between plot and story in Alfred Hitchcock's Vertigo. Hitchcock and screenwriter Samuel Taylor were both aware of the gaping hole in the plot, and yet it's the emotional story of the characters played by James Stewart and Kim Novak that make this one of Hitchcock's greatest films. There are spoilers in this video, proceed with caution!

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (writingwithhitchcock)

  • still fuzzy on the difference between plot and story

  • @mosh918 The best way to clarify it would be to think of Plot as a synopsis of events and Story as the emotional arc of the protagonist.

  • A Great Video. But I felt that Hitchcock was trying to make a reason on why Vertigo was a failure. This was the same thing with Under Capricorn. He tried to make a reason on why Under Capricorn was a failure. One of the reasons he gives was James Bridie (Screenwriter of Under Capricorn) was a part intellectual playwright. French Critics considers Under Capricorn as one of Hitchcock's finest films.

  • @konway87 Thank you. Despite comments to the contrary, Hitchcock definitely took criticism to heart. Having attention called to the "hole" in Vertigo by critics made that the easy target for Hitchcock to call it one of its weaknesses, which it may be. But he also blamed its commercial failure on Paramount's publicity. Re: Under Capricorn, choice of material not writer is the culprit. But in the Truffaut interview tapes, Hitchcock is actually quite candid about his being his own errors on UC.

see all

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @writingwithhitchcock I read somewhere that Hitchcock said the reason why VERTIGO was a such failure (at the time) was because of James Stewart's age. Interesting because VERTIGO was the last movie Hitchcock ever made with Stewart.

  • Elster is obviously a risk taker. If Elster can kill his wife, keep her dead body around for a while, hire his mistress Judy Barton to play the role of Madeleine while Scottie tails her around, risk Scottie hitting on Judy during the time that Judy was pretending she was Madeleine (thus risking that Judy will fall for Scottie and might even reveal the whole scheme), pay her off, dump her, then flee the country, then it's easy to see why he'd risk Scottie possibly reaching the top of the tower

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more