Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

METALLICA EXPLAINS CONFUSING-TO-MANY LULU

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
11,560
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 26, 2011

Metallica's Lars Ulrich and James Hetfield explain their confusing-to-many collaboration with Lou Reed for Lulu.

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • "effortless" yes lars we know....

  • New album on for 2012? Bullshit. Metallica have possibly become the slowest songwriters in heavy metal history. They spent 3 years getting St. Anger ready(although they almost broke up as a band in this period), and 3 more years getting Death Magnetic ready. A 2013 release is more likely, possibly even 2014 if they continue touring as often as they currently do.

see all

All Comments (164)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @M3T4LxAsSaSs1N Have you heard Lulu though? Each song is literally 7-13 minutes of Lou babbling on like an incoherent old man while the same instrumental plays in the background over... and over... and over... There's nothing wrong with taking a different direction and trying something new, but that album was such a heaping, steamy pile of shit... It's insulting to all music and they should be very ashamed of it.

  • 0:42 natural and effortlessly shitty

  • It's the same reaction like people had on the Load album n such. They try something new and suddenly it's like they aren't allowed to change whatsoever? C'mon people, i love Metallica and i respect them for what they want to do besides it's not like any of you could ever do what these guys did and are still doing

  • Fuck you Lars, Fuck you. Grow some balls James.

  • @konchase and if they were in it solely for jamming out for "the pleasure it brings (them) and others" then why don't they do what millions of other musicians do and play this terrible shit within the confines of their own homes/at backyard barbecues? oh yeah, because they couldn't make MONEY off of it that way? as far as "lulu" is concerned, i'll leave it up to you "non-conformists" who will "enjoy" the album because nobody else likes it.

  • @konchase you can't polish a turd. lulu is shit, and i'm not about to blow smoke up these guys asses and act like it's anything other than a fucking turd. st anger wasn't terrible, but lulu is god awful. honestly? i think i would have preferred to see metallica call it quits in 2001 rather than be remembered for something this fucking terrible.

  • So what's the song at 2:14 ?

  • im a Metallica fan, and i like it. \m/

  • Lulu was great !!! It was something else. Metallica are gods !!!

  • I thought Lulu was the best album Metallica have made in their career [the most sarcastic comment ever made].

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more