Robert Gibbs Calls Sean Hannity An Anti-Semite

Robert Gibbs, Barack Obama's Communications Director, tries to equate Obama's ties to domestic terrorist William Ayers with Sean Hannity's interview of someone who is antisemitic.

As you watch, notice how Gibbs never answers the question. Instead of being honest and forthright, the typical Obama campaign strategy is to use moral relativism to dismiss difficult questions all together.

Mr. Obama's relationship with William Ayers is far more than "guilt by association". The man is a known terrorist that participated in the bombings of the New York City police headquarters, the U.S. Capitol, and the Pentagon.

Mr. Obama has released a statement that he was only 8 years old when Ayers committed his crimes and condemned the violent acts, yet, in 1995, Ayers hosted a function for Obama during his first run for office. Would you have "coffee" with an admitted terrorist?

The issue here is not Sean Hannity. He is not running for President. Barack Obama is.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• alan
• anti-semite
• association
• ayers
• colmes
• foxnews
• gibbs
• guilt
• hannity
• obama
• robert
• sean
• terrorist
• william

[alexamerling20]

@kom1837 I see an eerie similarity between Hannity and Joseph Goebbels...

[BMANZZS]

@kom1837 You mean neoconservatives...

[sweetparvardi]

@clicksw. [Contin.] ...be able 2 do, other than just what the Saudi BL family did in relation 2 their despicable former family member, OBL, many years ago, if u were 2 continue down this sad road you're now on, to its' inevitable conclusion [not necessarily in the way of your going off into a life of murderous terrorism, but simply in the way of u continuing down the path your posts on this board show u to now be on, which is unquestionably one of your wilfully "embracing stupidity".]. [Contin.]

[sweetparvardi]

@clicksw. [Contin.] What more could ANY decent, honored, honorable, entirely repectable family DO ? !, when faced with such a most regrettably tragic situation, in order to totally clear their family's name from "idiots" like u attempting to besmirch their good, decent, honorable BL family name, built up over generations, for the sake of your own pathetic, transparent, bottom-of-the-barrel politically hyper-partisan conniving ? What more might YOUR family, Clickswitch, ever,,.. [Contin.]

[sweetparvardi]

@clicksw.;[Contin.]...any and all ties with their FORMER family member, OBL, by legally disowning him [thereby totally cutting him off from the $ 1,000,000 per year inheritence stipend he'd previously been receiving], totally repudiating him and all his truly vile and murderous terrorist activities, and just generally making it known that this former family member of their's was heretofore "totally dead" to them, due to the despicable path he'd willfully chosen 2 take his life down. [Contin.]

[sweetparvardi]

@clicksw.;[Contin.] ...PROUD and HONORED to have ever associated themselves with, and/or 2 continue 2 associate themselves with. As opposed to OBL himself, about whom the unquestioned historical record's quite clear, regarding the fact that DECADES AGO [some 19 years ago, in 1992], as soon as OBL's cold-bloodedly murderous tactics/philosophy in assoc. with the terrorist Al Qaeda group became known, the BL family, in Saudi A., took ALL available public and legal steps 2 TOTALLY sever...[Contin.]

[sweetparvardi]

@clicksw.; [Contin.]... the BL family with OBL himself, which's something that's simply a TOTAL logical / intellectual fallacy / "lie", in light of the clear, widely acknowledged very specific history betw. the BL family and OBL himself, where the BL family CONTINUES, to this very moment, to be an absolutely DISTINGUISHED, HONORED, HONORABLE, entirely RESPECTABLE Saudi family, that the Bush family, the Halliburton Co., or ANYONE [incl. YOU !, "Clickswitch"] can certainly be ENTIRELY...[Contin.]

[sweetparvardi]

@clicksw.; [Contin.] ...away with totally insulting the intelligence of absolutely EVERYONE here by continuing to pretend your original "factual" argument wasn't the totally logically indefensible absurdity it was / still is, simply by the act of your blindly and stubbornly repeating, with slightly diferent wording, the exact same totally specious argument u 1st made, thereby abysmally ignorantly attempting to continue your completely in vain attempt 2 somehow morally equate the ...[Contin.]

[sweetparvardi]

@clicksw.; [Contin.] ...had the incontrovertable, widely acknowledged history betw. the BL family and OBL himself, clearly explained to u, then I just feel sorry for u, because then u're quite simply "a dope !". But if, on the other hand, u ARE intellectually capable of understanding that the BL family and OBL himself are 2 ENTIRELY different entities, and in fact can in absolutely NO way be equated with each other, from the moral perspective, and yet STILL think u can somehow get ... [Contin.]

[sweetparvardi]

@clicksw.;[Contin.] ... discussions/arguments are inevitably destined, quite rightly, 2 end up in. But not this one. There's simply ISN'T any in the slightest way logical and intellectually defensible way 2 in any way morally equate the BL family with OBL himself, in light of the clear history betw. the BL family and OBL, and there're absolutely NO two ways about this, period ! If u actually still believe there's ANY moral equivalancy, betw. the BL family and OBL himself, after having [Contin.]