Mark Levin - Oct 14th - Alinsky's Rules for Radicals (Part 1 of 3)
Top Comments
All Comments (93)
-
@woodenmajor How is organizing into a political force, working within the political system to promote and elect delegates and candidates into positions of our representative government in order to enact Constitutional laws somehow totalitarian or an overthrow of the government? Alinsky advocated change through working within the system, not by violence or rebellion. Folks who disagree with you on when we should go to war or how we should tax doesn't make them a traitors. You need to get out more
-
@SuperCLabs Under your argument, we need no Congress at all. Do I need to remind you that both in the preamble and in the First Amendment, the Constitution grants Congress powers to create law providing for the general welfare of U.S. citizens. In fact, this provision was deemed so important, they mentioned it twice.
-
@huckfinn22 If you need civil rights then you are admitting that the Constitution which grants equal rights to all is unequal to the task. Where does it stop?
-
hahahaha ... Salinsky considered himself radical, but he was just a non-violent guy with a strategy on how to work within the system to enact change rather than use really radical "2nd Amendment" solutions. Kind of like the Tea Party has done to the Republican Party ousting moderates with radical righties. Except Salinsky favored things like Civil Rights and an end to the Vietnam War by encouraging progressives to organize, become delegates and get their agenda elected. Yeah, real scary. hahaha
-
these verminous alinsky radicals intend to DESTROY our republic and replace it with another bolshevik totalitarian police state .they do not represent just another political point of view ,they represent an intentional overthrow of our constitution ,our bill of rights and our national identity .they hate America and they hate americans .they are then ,by definition ,TRAITORS and should be regarded as such .
-
James Madison had said it best “I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.”
-
what a crock!Im a Repub but the current revisionism of the neo cons, no, these are dumbasses....Hitler was a socialist?
-
Obama is going to lose in 2012 in a LANDSLIDE! Then republicans have one last chance to prove that they are different than the democrats, and one way to ensure that is to NOT vote for Mitt Romney. Herman Cain is the only viable conservative left in the race. If he wins the nomination then we're back on track. The icing on the cake would be Michelle Bachmann for VP. She'll stamp out any vestiges of Obamacare not eliminated by the Supreme Court and that is job #1 in 2012.
-
@odat83 Hey dummy why don't you learn something about the man instead of running your cork soaker? Clueless turd smoker, GET A CLUE!!!
-
TEOTWAWKI is coming. Another 5,000 rounds of 7.62 x 39 for me, please.
I think Liberals think that people have been defecting to Russia for the last 50 years. I dont see Mexicans rowing their boats to Cuba? They're climbing our fence.
MrKickaliberal 2 years ago 24
what i cant understand is why liberals think they are the revolution. Do they not understand that america is the revolution we are the opposite of the rest of the socialistic world. why do young people all think that being a liberal and pro socialism is Cool or even Makes Sense. heres what i want liberals to realize america and capitalism are the only beckons of hope in this world. don't believe me look whats happening to china who is adopting capitalism and freedom. need i say more.
Dpain1987 2 years ago 6