Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Humorous Illustration while speaking on Evolution

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
148,785
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 23, 2008

Excerpt from Ravi Zacharias message
For complete message, please email suvisheshakan@hotmail.com

For other messages by Ravi Zacharias, please visit the channel below.(http://www.youtube.com/rzimmedia)

  • likes, 128 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2,489)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @UpoundBUTTS Baloney. You can't test efoolution. TRUE science if observable, testable and repeatable. Efoolution is anything but.

  • ... said the balding 70 year old male mammalian vertebrate

  • What sermon part is this?

    I always love his sermons

  • @UpoundBUTTS

    Romans 1;22"thinking themselves wise they became fools" ,you can assert all the arguments you like ,even dress it up with wonderful articulation but in doing so ,you smuggle in the Christian value of logic ,as without GOD ,there is no such thing ,just random molecular and electic activity ,and without GOD you still have to believe in a thing unobserved ,and the notion of nothing becoming something,and people say Christianity is a leap of faith

  • @roxfoot

    Evolution is testable. It is falsifiable. It does not rely on the supernatural; It s a natural process. Even if it were to be falsified, which is extremely unlikely at this point, it would only be eligible for falsification because it is a legitimate hypothesis.

    Anything can have philosophical implications. Quantum mechanics has philosophical implications. That doesn't mean it isn't scientific..

  • The story was funny but not relevant.

  • @crawhonda

    neither is evolution ,its philosophy

  • Cursing, name-calling, unexplained assertions, and bullying...none of them is science.

  • @particle58 You might also be interested in the fact that The Origin of Species was on the Nazi list of forbidden books, and that Galton's theories of social darwinism in fact have nothing to do with the theory of evolution or naturalistic views. In fact, Galton's thinking is perfectly compatible with theistic views on racial purity and inherited sin, via the curse of Ham. The "science" behind it had as good quality as the "science" of phrenology and basically involves making shit up.

  • @particle58 The fact that they are fringe views *today*, and that Christians use terms like Judeo-Christian *today* is mostly a result of both WWII propaganda demonizing the Nazis and the observations of the consequences of WWII. Pre WWII, Christians did not identify with the Jews in any significant way and the Jews had the role as the-other, a target to be painted with conspiracy theories.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more